Implications of geoengineering under the 1.5 °C target: Analysis and policy suggestions

被引:11
|
作者
Chen Ying [1 ]
Xin Yuan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CASS, Inst Urban & Environm Studies, Beijing 100028, Peoples R China
[2] CASS, Grad Sch, Beijing 102488, Peoples R China
[3] China Meteorol Adm, Dev & Res Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Paris Agreement; 1.5 degrees C target; Geoengineering; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.accre.2017.05.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paris Agreement introduced a 1.5 degrees C target to control the rise in global temperature, but clear arrangements for feasible implementation pathways were not made. Achieving the 1.5 degrees C target imposes high requirements on global emission reduction. Nationally Determined Contributions of all Parties are far from the 1.5 degrees C target, and conventional emission reduction technologies and policies will also have difficulty in fulfilling this task. In this context, geoengineering is gaining interest in the international arena. The Paris Agreement includes afforestation, carbon capture, utilization and storage, and negative emission technologies such as bio-energy with carbon capture and store. All of these techniques are CO2 removal technologies that belong to geoengineering. Solar radiation management, which is highly controversial, has also attracted increased attention in recent years. Although the outline of the IPCC Special Report on 1.5 degrees C does not include a specific section on geoengineering issues yet, geoengineering is an unconventional technical option that cannot be avoided in research and discussions on impact assessment, technical options, ethics, and international governance under the 1.5 degrees C target. On the basis of analyzing and discussing above-mentioned issues, this paper proposes several policy suggestions for China to strengthen research on and response to geoengineering.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target
    MacMartin, Douglas G.
    Ricke, Katharine L.
    Keith, David W.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 376 (2119):
  • [2] Emission scenario analysis for China under the global 1.5 °C target
    Jiang, Kejun
    He, Chenmin
    Dai, Hancheng
    Liu, Jia
    Xu, Xiangyang
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (05) : 481 - 491
  • [3] Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for solar geoengineering
    Juan B. Moreno-Cruz
    David W. Keith
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2013, 121 : 431 - 444
  • [4] Climate policy under uncertainty: a case for solar geoengineering
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan B.
    Keith, David W.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 121 (03) : 431 - 444
  • [5] A history of the 1.5°C target
    Cointe, Beatrice
    Guillemot, Helene
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [6] Population exposure to droughts in China under the 1.5°C global warming target
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Yujie
    Pan, Tao
    Liu, Yanhua
    Sun, Fubao
    Ge, Quansheng
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2018, 9 (03) : 1097 - 1106
  • [7] Critical mineral constraints in global renewable scenarios under 1.5 °C target
    Wang, Peng
    Chen, Wei-Qiang
    Cui, Xueqin
    Li, Jiashuo
    Li, Wen
    Wang, Chenyang
    Cai, Wenjia
    Geng, Xinyi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 17 (12)
  • [8] 1.5 °C target: Not a hopeless imagination
    Jiang, Ke-Jun
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (02) : 93 - 94
  • [9] Reaching 1.5 and 2.0 °C global surface temperature targets using stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
    Tilmes, Simone
    MacMartin, Douglas G.
    Lenaerts, Jan T. M.
    van Kampenhout, Leo
    Muntjewerf, Laura
    Xia, Lili
    Harrison, Cheryl S.
    Krumhardt, Kristen M.
    Mills, Michael J.
    Kravitz, Ben
    Robock, Alan
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (03) : 579 - 601
  • [10] Analysis on Enterprise System of Cooperatives and Policy Suggestions
    Luo, Jianli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 43 - 47