A history of the 1.5°C target

被引:14
|
作者
Cointe, Beatrice [1 ]
Guillemot, Helene [2 ]
机构
[1] PSL Univ, Ctr Sociol Innovat CSI, Mines Paris, i3 UMR CNRS, Paris, France
[2] Ctr Alexandre Koyre, Aubervilliers, France
关键词
1.5 degrees C target; climate policy target; IPCC Special Report; Paris Agreement; science-policy interface; CLIMATE; POLITICS; SCIENCE; IPCC;
D O I
10.1002/wcc.824
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The 1.5 degrees C target is now widely considered as the maximum acceptable limit for global warming. However, it is at once recent and, as it appears increasingly unreachable, already almost obsolete. Adopted as an aspirational target in the Paris Agreement in 2015, the 1.5 degrees C objective originated with a political impetus within UNFCCC negotiations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) endorsed this policy-driven target when it produced the Special Report on 1.5 degrees C. This article highlights the continuity of the history of the 1.5 degrees C target with that of the 2 degrees C target, but also the differences between the two. Because the 1.5 degrees C target considerably raises the bar on mitigation efforts, it exacerbates political tensions and ambiguities that were already latent in the 2 degrees C target. This article retraces the emergence of the 1.5 degrees C in diplomatic negotiations, the preparation of the IPCC Special report on 1.5 degrees C, and the new kinds of debates they provoked among climate scientists and experts. To explain how an unreachable target became the reference for climate action, we analyze the political calibration of climate science and politics, which can also be described as a codependency between climate science and politics. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Assessment Modeling Climate, History, Society, Culture > World Historical Perspectives Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 1.5 °C target: Not a hopeless imagination
    Jiang, Ke-Jun
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (02) : 93 - 94
  • [2] 1.5°C will be History tomorrow - act now!
    Hanisch, Felix
    [J]. ATP MAGAZINE, 2023, (11-12): : 88 - 88
  • [3] Probabilistic assessment of realizing the 1.5 °C climate target
    Marcucci, Adriana
    Panos, Evangelos
    Kypreos, Socrates
    Fragkos, Panagiotis
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 239 : 239 - 251
  • [4] Impacts on terrestrial biodiversity of moving from a 2°C to a 1.5°C target
    Smith, Pete
    Price, Jeff
    Molotoks, Amy
    Warren, Rachel
    Malhi, Yadvinder
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2018, 376 (2119):
  • [5] The contribution of the German building sector to achieve the 1.5 °C target
    Kropp, Tobias
    Lennerts, Kunibert
    Fisch, Manfred Norbert
    Kley, Christian
    Wilken, Thomas
    Marx, Simon
    Zak, Jan
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2022, 13 (01) : 511 - 530
  • [6] Assessment of GHG emission pathways consistent with 1.5 °C target
    Masui, Toshihiko
    Nishioka, Shuzo
    [J]. CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (05) : 443 - 445
  • [8] History of the 2°C climate target
    Randalls, Samuel
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2010, 1 (04) : 598 - 605
  • [9] Negative-emissions technology portfolios to meet the 1.5??C target
    Rueda, O.
    Mogollon, J. M.
    Tukker, A.
    Scherer, L.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 67
  • [10] Implications of geoengineering under the 1.5 °C target: Analysis and policy suggestions
    Chen Ying
    Xin Yuan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (02) : 123 - 129