Conflict Resolution Using Graph Model for Conflict Resolution Case Study on Majalaya's Textile Industries Waste Pollution

This study is aimed at analyzing conflict resolution using a Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) approach. The research object is waste pollution case in Majalaya's textile industry in the upstream area of Citarum river in Bandung regency. GMCR is used to describe the agreed optimal solution based on the preferences of each party involved in the conflict, namely the government of West Java province, the residents of Majalaya, the textile industry, and the independent environmental expert in the city of Bandung. From the results of stability analysis, it is discovered that there are only two stable scenarios (equilibrium) for all parties, namely scenario 6 (happy ending) and 9 (bad ending). Scenario 9 is called a bad ending scenario, because the local residents ultimately held a demonstration against the textile industry since the government did not give them a strict punishment for causing waste pollution as they have not maximized their WWTP functions, thus it would cause an operational disruption of the textile industry. While scenario 6 is called happy ending scenario because the textile industry eventually maximized their WWTP functions, the local people would not go on demonstration, and the environmental experts would not make negative publicity about the textile industry. In conclusion, based on sensitivity analysis, scenario 6 was more expected to occur by a textile industry as the conflict resolution over the Majalaya's waste pollution case. However, to achieve scenario 6, some compensations should be given by other parties to the local residents of Majalaya and to the independent environmental experts. If the compensations were not given then it is very likely that scenario 9 would happen and it would become the resolution of conflict for the textile industry waste pollution case in Majalaya.