Resolving safety issues for a demonstration fusion power plant

被引:19
|
作者
Taylor, Neill [1 ]
Ciattaglia, Sergio [2 ]
Boyer, Helen [1 ]
Coombs, Dave [1 ]
Jin, Xue Zhou [3 ]
Liger, Karine [4 ]
Mora, Juan Carlos [5 ]
Mazzini, Guido [6 ]
Pinna, Tonio [7 ]
Urbonavicius, Egidijus [8 ]
机构
[1] CCFE, Culham Sci Ctr, UKAEA, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
[2] EUROfus Consortium, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[3] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Neutron Phys & Reactor Technol INR, Herrmann von Helmholtz Pl 1, D-76344 Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany
[4] CEA Cadarache, DTN SMTA LIPC, Bat 208, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
[5] CIEMAT, Ave Complutense 40, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[6] Ctr Vyzkumu Rez CVRez, Hlavni 130, Husinec Rez 25068, Czech Republic
[7] ENEA UTFUS TECN, Via Enrico Fermi 45, I-00044 Rome, Italy
[8] Lithuanian Energy Inst, Breslaujos G 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
DEMO; Safety; Environment; Licensing;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.018
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The conceptual design studies for a European DEMO, include safety studies and analyses, to help guide the design process and start preparation for eventual licensing. A safety approach has been adopted that is expected to satisfy a nuclear regulator, but at this early stage it is difficult to anticipate the safety concerns that may be raised. Potential safety issues for DEMO that have been listed by a regulatory technical body include decay heat removal following an accidental loss of cooling or during blanket module replacement, the minimization of occupational radiation exposure, the comprehensive identification of postulated accident scenarios, the environmental release of gaseous tritium during normal operation, and the management of radioactive waste, particularly where contaminated with tritium. Here we explain how these issues are being addressed in the safety programme for a EU DEMO, and are taken into account in the design from the beginning of its conception. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1180
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Key issues for the safety and licensing of fusion
    Taylor, NP
    FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 47 (04) : 959 - 966
  • [22] Fusion reactor safety - Issues and perspective
    Inabe, T
    Seki, M
    Tsunematsu, T
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1998, 42 : 7 - 12
  • [23] An update of safety and environmental issues for fusion
    Gulden, W
    Cook, I
    Marbach, G
    Raeder, J
    Petti, D
    Seki, Y
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2000, 51-52 : 419 - 427
  • [24] SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL-ISSUES OF FUSION
    PEASE, RS
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1991, 14 (1-2) : 25 - 36
  • [25] The ultimate safety margins of ITER: a demonstration of the safety potential of fusion
    Petti, DA
    Bartels, HW
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1999, 46 (2-4) : 237 - 242
  • [26] Chemical hazards and safety issues in fusion safety design
    Cadwallader, LC
    FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 44 (02) : 369 - 374
  • [27] APPLICATION OF A METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE PRIORITIES OF NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT SAFETY ISSUES
    DALING, PM
    MILSTEAD, WC
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1989, 115 (2-3) : 273 - 279
  • [28] Identification of safety gaps for fusion demonstration reactors
    Wu, Y.
    Chen, Z.
    Hu, L.
    Jin, M.
    Li, Y.
    Jiang, J.
    Yu, J.
    Alejaldre, C.
    Stevens, E.
    Kim, K.
    Maisonnier, D.
    Kalashnikov, A.
    Tobita, K.
    Jackson, D.
    Perrault, D.
    NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
  • [29] Identification of safety gaps for fusion demonstration reactors
    Wu Y.
    Chen Z.
    Hu L.
    Jin M.
    Li Y.
    Jiang J.
    Yu J.
    Alejaldre C.
    Stevens E.
    Kim K.
    Maisonnier D.
    Kalashnikov A.
    Tobita K.
    Jackson D.
    Perrault D.
    Wu, Y. (yican.wu@fds.org.cn), 1600, Nature Publishing Group (01)
  • [30] A METHODOLOGY TO DETERMINE PRIORITIES FOR NUCLEAR-POWER PLANT GENERIC SAFETY ISSUES
    GALLUCCI, RHV
    ANDREWS, WB
    HENAGER, CH
    KONZEK, GJ
    EMRIT, RC
    NUCLEAR SAFETY, 1984, 25 (05): : 609 - 622