Using submerged membrane bioreactors for biological nutrient removal from municipal wastewater

被引:0
|
作者
Mouthon-Bello, J. [1 ]
Zhou, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
activated sludge; biological nutrient removal; membrane bioreactor; membrane filtration; nitrification; wastewater treatment; water reuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A pilot submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) equipped with ZeeWeed(R) 10 hollow fibre modules was used to remove the nutrients from the primary effluent at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. The pilot plant was operated by varying SRT and HRT and mixed liquor recirculation ratio to obtain the concentration of MLSS up to 16 gMLSS/L. Average operational data collected from these pilot tests were compared for three SMBR configurations achieve post-denitrification, and pre-denitrification, respectively. The collected data were then used to fit to IWA ASM2D model for COD and nitrogen removal in steady-state conditions. The results showed that All configurations could accommodate nitrification-denitrification process. Pilot plant tests showed high COD and ammonia removal (above 90%) but total nitrogen removal was moderate (above 70%). Aerobic conditions in the SMBR enable nitrification thus releasing nitrate in the permeate. Phosphorous removal was above 93% because its precipitation with ferric chloride added in the grit chamber at the wastewater treatment plant. The model was able to predict the COD and nitrogen effluent for the configurations tested. With one exception, stoichiometric and kinetic parameters obtained for the ASM2d model are in agreement with those reported in the literature for typical activated sludge process. Post-denitrifiaction configuration showed better nitrogen removal, but required higher oxygen supply needs.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 676
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Nutrient Removal and Recovery from Municipal Wastewater
    Derco, Jan
    Gotvajn, Andreja Zgajnar
    Gulasova, Patricia
    Kassai, Angelika
    Soltysova, Nikola
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [12] Effects of various factors on critical flux in submerged membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment
    Wu, Zhichao
    Wang, Zhiwei
    Huang, Shengsan
    Mai, Suihai
    Yang, Caifeng
    Wang, Xinhua
    Zhou, Zhen
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 62 (01) : 56 - 63
  • [13] Baffled membrane bioreactor (BMBR) for efficient nutrient removal from municipal wastewater
    Kimura, Katsuki
    Nishisako, Rie
    Miyoshi, Taro
    Shimada, Ryusuke
    Watanabe, Yoshimasa
    WATER RESEARCH, 2008, 42 (03) : 625 - 632
  • [14] Indigenous somatic coliphage removal from a real municipal wastewater by a submerged membrane bioreactor
    Wu, Jinling
    Li, Haitao
    Huang, Xia
    WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (06) : 1853 - 1862
  • [15] Biological nutrient removal characteristics of low strength municipal wastewater
    Choi, ES
    Lee, HS
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 13 (04) : 364 - 368
  • [16] Treatment of swine wastewater by submerged membrane bioreactors with consideration of estrogenic activity removal
    Yang, W.
    Cicek, N.
    DESALINATION, 2008, 231 (1-3) : 200 - 208
  • [17] Municipal wastewater biological nutrient removal driven by the fermentation liquid of dairy wastewater
    Liu, Hui
    Chen, Yinguang
    Wu, Jiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 38 (21) : 2639 - 2649
  • [18] Atrazine Removal from Municipal Wastewater Using a Membrane Bioreactor
    Kamaz, Mohanad
    Jones, Steven M.
    Qian, Xianghong
    Watts, Michael J.
    Zhang, Wen
    Wickramasinghe, S. Ranil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (07)
  • [19] Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor system for biological nutrient removal
    Mouthon-Bello, Javier
    Zhou, Hondge
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2006, 78 (05) : 538 - 547
  • [20] Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor system for biological nutrient removal
    Kakoli, Sarah Tahsin Noor
    Ferdows, Mahmuda
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 79 (04) : 450 - 451