Prognostics for advanced compressor health monitoring

被引:1
|
作者
Krok, M [1 ]
Goebel, K [1 ]
机构
[1] GE Global Res, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
关键词
sensor validation; prognostics; diagnostics; information fusion; data fusion; simulation; surge; stall;
D O I
10.1117/12.497300
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Axial flow compressors are subjected to demands for ever-increasing levels of pressure ratio at a compression efficiency that augments the overall cycle efficiency. However, unstable flow may develop in the compressor, which can lead to a stall or surge and subsequently to gas turbine failure resulting in significant downtime and cost to repair. To protect against these potential aerodynamic instabilities, compressors are typically operated with a stall margin. This means operating the compressor at less than peak pressure rise which results in a reduction in operating efficiency and performance. Therefore, it is desirable to have a reliable method to determine the state of a compressor by detecting the onset of a damaging event prior to its occurrence. In this paper, we propose a health monitoring scheme that gathers and combines the results of different diagnostic tools to maximize the advantages of each one while at the same time minimizing their disadvantages. This fusion scheme produces results that are better than the best result by any one tool used. In part this is achieved because redundant information is available that when combined correctly improves the estimate of the better tool and compensates for the shortcomings of the less capable tool. We discuss the usage of diagnostic information fusion for a compressor event coupled with proactive control techniques to support improved compressor performance while at the same time avoid the increased damage risk due to stall margin reduction. Discretized time to failure windows provide event prediction in a prognostic sense.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tutorial for Prognostics and Health Management of Gears and Bearings: Advanced Signal Processing Technique
    Kim, Seokgoo
    Lim, Chaeyoung
    Ham, Seok-Ju
    Park, Hyungjun
    Choi, Joo-Ho
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, 2018, 42 (12) : 1119 - 1131
  • [42] Prognostics and Condition Monitoring of Electronics
    Lall, Pradeep
    Gupta, Prashant
    Panchagade, Dhananjay
    Kulkarni, Manish
    Suhling, Jeff
    Hofmeister, James
    [J]. EUROSIME 2009: THERMAL, MECHANICAL AND MULTI-PHYSICS SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENTS IN MICRO-ELECTRONICS AND MICRO-SYSTEMS, 2009, : 455 - +
  • [43] A Set-Based Prognostics Approach for Wind Turbine Blade Health Monitoring
    Boutrous, Khoury
    Puig, Vicenc
    Nejjari, Fatiha
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (06): : 402 - 407
  • [44] Performance-Based Gas Turbine Health Monitoring, Diagnostics, and Prognostics: A Survey
    Hanachi, Houman
    Mechefske, Christopher
    Liu, Jie
    Banerjee, Avisekh
    Chen, Ying
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2018, 67 (03) : 1340 - 1363
  • [45] Hybrid fault diagnostics and prognostics system development for motor bearings health monitoring
    Abbasi, Muhammad Asim
    Huang, Shiping
    Khan, Aadil Sarwar
    [J]. QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [47] Intelligent Prognostics for Battery Health Monitoring Using the Mean Entropy and Relevance Vector Machine
    Li, Hong
    Pan, Donghui
    Chen, C. L. Philip
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2014, 44 (07): : 851 - 862
  • [48] HEALTH MONITORING AND DEGRADATION PROGNOSTICS IN GAS TURBINE ENGINES USING DYNAMIC NEURAL NETWORKS
    Vatani, A.
    Khorasani, K.
    Meskin, N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2015, VOL 6, 2015,
  • [49] Aero engine health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance: an overview
    Rath, Narahari
    Mishra, R. K.
    Kushari, Abhijit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TURBO & JET-ENGINES, 2022,
  • [50] Advanced Sensors and Health Monitoring - Editorial
    Mita, A
    Spencer, BF
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING, 2005, 12 (3-4): : 225 - 225