Improving the Consistency of the Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) Documents in Semiconductor Manufacturing

被引:10
|
作者
Razouk, Houssam [1 ,2 ]
Kern, Roman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Interact Syst & Data Sci, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[2] Infineon Technol Austria AG, Innovat Funding Management, A-9500 Villach, Austria
[3] Know Ctr GmbH, Area Knowledge Discovery, A-8010 Graz, Austria
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 04期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
digitalization; semiconductor manufacturing industry; FMEA; NLP; consistency improvement; causal data science; SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/app12041840
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Digitalization of causal domain knowledge is crucial. Especially since the inclusion of causal domain knowledge in the data analysis processes helps to avoid biased results. To extract such knowledge, the Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) documents represent a valuable data source. Originally, FMEA documents were designed to be exclusively produced and interpreted by human domain experts. As a consequence, these documents often suffer from data consistency issues. This paper argues that due to the transitive perception of the causal relations, discordant and merged information cases are likely to occur. Thus, we propose to improve the consistency of FMEA documents as a step towards more efficient use of causal domain knowledge. In contrast to other work, this paper focuses on the consistency of causal relations expressed in the FMEA documents. To this end, based on an explicit scheme of types of inconsistencies derived from the causal perspective, novel methods to enhance the data quality in FMEA documents are presented. Data quality improvement will significantly improve downstream tasks, such as root cause analysis and automatic process control.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on Xoft®
    Palaniswaamy, G.
    Richardson, S.
    Rangaraj, D.
    Mutic, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [22] FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) IMPLEMENTATION
    Rojas Lema, Sandra
    3C TECNOLOGIA, 2019, 8 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [23] Clinical risk analysis with failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) model in a dialysis unit
    Bonfant, Giovanna
    Belfanti, Pietro
    Paternoster, Giuseppe
    Gabrielli, Danila
    Gaiter, Alberto M.
    Manes, Massimo
    Molino, Andrea
    Pellu, Valentina
    Ponzetti, Clemente
    Farina, Massimo
    Nebiolo, Pier E.
    JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 23 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [24] Analytical performance assessment and improvement by means of the Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)
    Guinon, Leonor
    Soler, Anna
    Gisell Diaz, Monica
    Maria Fernandez, Rosa
    Rico, Nayra
    Lluis Bedini, Josep
    Mira, Aurea
    Alvarez, Luisa
    BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2020, 30 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [25] Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling
    Sharma, Rajiv
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Kumar, Pradeep
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (09) : 986 - +
  • [26] Correlating Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) & Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
    Ahire, Chandrajit P.
    Relkar, Anand S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING OPTIMIZATION AND COMPUTING, 2012, 38 : 3482 - 3486
  • [27] Reliability/mistake-proofing using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
    Terninko, J
    ASQ'S 57TH ANNUAL QUALITY CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS: EXPANDING HORIZON: GLOBAL, PERSONAL, TOOLS, NETWORKING, SOLUTIONS, 2003, : 515 - 526
  • [28] Use of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) for assessment of the homogenization of fly ash
    Malindzakova, Marcela
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2019, 98 (11): : 1797 - 1801
  • [29] FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS (FMEA) OF BUTTERFLY VALVE IN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY
    Bin Yusof, Muhammad Amirul
    Abdullah, Nazlin Hanie Bt
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 11 : 9 - 19
  • [30] Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Pipeline Ball Valves in the Offshore Industry
    Sotoodeh, Karan
    JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 20 (04) : 1175 - 1183