Velocity and discharge measurements at selected locations on the Mississippi River during the great flood of 1993 using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler

被引:5
|
作者
Admiraal, D
Demissie, M
机构
[1] M. IWRA Office of Sediment & Wetland Studies Illinois State Water Survey, CHAMPAIGN, IL, 61820-7495
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02508069608686508
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A relatively new device overcomes the difficulty of traditional methods in measuring discharge during floods because of the time required to measure velocities across wide and deep flow areas. The Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) makes it possible to measure a large number of velocities and discharges in a very short time, but several limitations of the instrument need to be understood before it can be used effectively. The ADCP uses sound waves to measure water depth and velocity profiles at positions along the transect of a channel. The device determines water depth by measuring how long it takes for an acoustic signal to be reflected off the channel bottom and simultaneously calculates the velocity profile of the channel by measuring the Doppler shift of sound waves reflected off sediment particles (which are assumed to have the same velocity as the water) at multiple depths. The collection of velocities, discharges, and depths measured at each position is called an ensemble of data, and a transect of the channel consists of many ensembles of data. Distances between positions where ensembles of data are taken are not constant and vary depending on the speed of the boat on which the ADCP is mounted. For the purposes of evaluating the carrying capacity of floodplains, an ADCP was used to measure velocity and discharge data at six locations on the Mississippi River during the Great Flood of 1993. Data collected for both the main channel and the floodplain at river mile (RM) 218 are presented in this article. Discharge measurements were very consistent for most transects of the river but measurements of velocity and position were not. Measurement errors may have been due to a direction sensor misreading, but the errors had little or no effect on calculation of discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 151
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Decomposition of Uncertainty Sources in Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler Streamflow Measurements Using Repeated Measures Experiments
    Despax, Aurelien
    Le Coz, Jerome
    Hauet, Alexandre
    Mueller, David S.
    Engel, Frank L.
    Blanquart, Bertrand
    Renard, Benjamin
    Oberg, Kevin A.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (09) : 7520 - 7540
  • [32] Correcting acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurement bias from moving-bed conditions without global positioning during the 2004 Glen Canyon Dam controlled flood on the Colorado River
    Gartner, Jeffrey W.
    Ganju, Neil K.
    LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY-METHODS, 2007, 5 : 156 - 162
  • [33] QUANTIFYING RIVER ACCRETION IN THE UPPER RIO GRANDE GORGE, NEW MEXICO, BY USING AN ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER
    Kinzli, K. -D.
    Shafike, N.
    Bauer, P.
    Lundahl, A.
    Schmidt-Petersen, R.
    Harris, S.
    Lewis, G.
    Johnson, P.
    Timmons, M.
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 29 (01) : 4 - 16
  • [34] Evaluating water availability and flow characteristics for Dikrong river in Arunachal Pradesh using Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
    Ghritartha Goswami
    Joon Darang
    Ram Kailash Prasad
    Sameer Mandal
    Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2024, 10
  • [35] Evaluating water availability and flow characteristics for Dikrong river in Arunachal Pradesh using Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
    Goswami, Ghritartha
    Darang, Joon
    Prasad, Ram Kailash
    Mandal, Sameer
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [36] Role of turbulence fluctuations on uncertainties of acoustic Doppler current profiler discharge measurements (vol 48, W08901, 2012)
    Tarrab, Leticia
    Garcia, Carlos M.
    Cantero, Mariano I.
    Oberg, Kevin
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [37] Comprehensive measurement techniques of water flow, bedload and suspended sediment in large river using Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
    Okada, S.
    Yorozuya, A.
    Koseki, H.
    Kudo, S.
    Muraoka, K.
    RIVER SEDIMENTATION, 2017, : 258 - 258
  • [38] Combining fixed- and moving-vessel acoustic Doppler current profiler measurements for improved characterization of the mean flow in a natural river
    Petrie, John
    Diplas, Panayiotis
    Gutierrez, Marte
    Nam, Soonkie
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (09) : 5600 - 5614
  • [39] OBSERVATIONS OF NEAR-INERTIAL WAVES IN ACOUSTIC DOPPLER CURRENT PROFILER MEASUREMENTS MADE DURING THE MIXED LAYER DYNAMICS EXPERIMENT
    CHERESKIN, TK
    LEVINE, MD
    HARDING, AJ
    REGIER, LA
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1989, 94 (C6): : 8135 - 8145
  • [40] Discharge Measurements in Lowland Rivers: Field Comparison Between an Electromagnetic Open Channel Flow Meter (EOCFM) and an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP)
    Bialik, Robert J.
    Karpinski, Mikolaj
    Rajwa, Agnieszka
    ACHIEVEMENTS, HISTORY AND CHALLENGES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2014, : 213 - 222