Foreign direct investment in developing economies A study on the productivity spillover effects in Latin America

被引:0
|
作者
Pereira Bruhn, Nadia Campos [1 ]
Leal Calegario, Cristina Lelis [2 ]
Mendonca, Douglas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas, Ctr Integracao Mercosul, Pelotas, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras, Lavras, Brazil
来源
RAUSP MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | 2020年 / 55卷 / 01期
关键词
Spillover effects; Latin American countries; Foreign direct investment; Total factor productivity; PANEL-DATA; EFFICIENCY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1108/RAUSP-07-2018-0042
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The aim of this study was to investigate how the productivity spillover effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the Latin American economies are manifested. Specifically, the paper sought to identify the role of foreign presence and government intervention through an industrial policy on total factor productivity in Latin American countries. Design/methodology/approach - The analyses in this study were performed in two stages. The first step consisted of decomposing the total factor productivity growth, in technical efficiency change (EC) and technological efficiency change (TC), using the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI). In the second stage of this research, the specific EC and TC indexes of each country - obtained with the MPI - are used alternately as a dependent variable in a regression analysis with dynamic panel data. The variables were collected from the World Development Indicators database, available in the World Bank database, and cover the period from 1994 to 2014. Findings - FDI has contributed to not only the catch-up effect - i.e. to continuous improvements in production processes and products using the same technology - but also in terms of productivity, due to technological innovations and the frontier-shift effect Industrial policies, such as the FDI attraction, when established in isolation, are not able to contribute to the generation of productivity spillovers, measured in terms of technical and technological efficiency. Research limitations/implications - The limitation of the present study lies precisely in the nature of data aggregation that actually limits a more in-depth analysis of the object of study. The available data set for the analysis in this study does not provide a detailed examination of the domestic corporations' characteristics, the sectors and motivations of multinational corporations of each one of the analyzed economies. Practical implications - The outcomes of this research present several practical implications, as its development is based on the recognition that productivity is essential for the development of a country. It remains the Achilles heel of the Latin American economies, and therefore, it is necessary and essential to move toward a change in its development model and, more specifically, in its industrial policies, with a focus on investment and innovation to achieve the new sustainable development objectives. Among the main challenges presented to governments in the region is the emergence of policies aimed at establishing a sustainable development path through industrial policies capable of accelerating productivity growth. Social implications - The evidence presented in this study highlights the importance of better understanding the real effects of state intervention through the use of industrial policy instruments and how they affect foreigners' investment decisions, as the lack of clear industrial policy orientation that is systematically integrated with MNEs' operations may result in economic development opportunities below the ideal. Originality/value - The research results corroborate the foundations of spillover effects theory and with the recognition that the intensity of the effect of the foreign participation on the performance of economies will depend on the absorption capacity of host economies.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 54
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Institutional quality and foreign direct investment in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Fukumi, Atsushi
    Nishijima, Shoji
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2010, 42 (14) : 1857 - 1864
  • [22] Economic reforms and inflows of foreign direct investment in Latin America
    Biglaiser, G
    DeRouen, K
    LATIN AMERICAN RESEARCH REVIEW, 2006, 41 (01) : 51 - 75
  • [23] Tax Policy, Foreign Direct Investment and Spillover Effects in Africa
    Boly, Amadou
    Coulibaly, Seydou
    Kere, Eric N.
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2020, 29 (03) : 306 - 331
  • [24] Spatial Spillover Effects from Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam
    Tran Toan Thang
    Thi Song Hanh Pham
    Barnes, Bradley R.
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2016, 52 (10): : 1431 - 1445
  • [25] International migration, foreign direct investment, and development stage in developing economies
    Phyo, Ei Ei
    Goto, Hideaki
    Kakinaka, Makoto
    REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2019, 23 (02) : 940 - 956
  • [26] ASSESSMENT OF FACTOR INFLUENCING ATTRACTION OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT TO DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
    Kozhevnikov, Konstantin Igorevich
    Pridvizhkin, Stanislav Victorovich
    Bazhenov, Oleg Victorovich
    Kozhevnikova, Margarita Karpovna
    Zasukhina, Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRENDS OF TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATIONS IN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES 2017, 2017, 38 : 52 - 57
  • [27] Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Developing African Economies
    Mebratu Seyoum
    Renshui Wu
    Jihong Lin
    Social Indicators Research, 2015, 122 : 45 - 64
  • [28] Effects of corporate taxes on foreign investment in Latin America
    Agostini, Claudio A.
    Raquel Jalile, Ileana
    LATIN AMERICAN RESEARCH REVIEW, 2009, 44 (02) : 84 - 108
  • [29] Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Case of Developing African Economies
    Seyoum, Mebratu
    Wu, Renshui
    Lin, Jihong
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2015, 122 (01) : 45 - 64
  • [30] Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America
    Sapkota, Pratikshya
    Bastola, Umesh
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 206 - 212