The Effect of Chemical Surface Treatments on the Flexural Strength of Repaired Acrylic Denture Base Resin

被引:9
|
作者
Thunyakitpisal, Nonglax [1 ]
Thunyakitpisal, Pasutha [2 ,3 ]
Wiwatwarapan, Chairat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Anat, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Res Unit Herbs & Nat Prod Dent Applicat, Dent Biomat Sci Program, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
Acrylic resin; flexural strength; methyl formate; methyl acetate; repair; TRANSVERSE STRENGTH; METHYLENE-CHLORIDE; BOND STRENGTH; METHACRYLATE; MICROWAVE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00688.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of the selected chemical surface treatment agents on the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic resin repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin. Materials and Methods: Ninety heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens (Meliodent) were prepared according to ISO1567 and randomly divided into nine groups: positive and negative control groups (groups I and II), and seven experimental groups (groups III to IX). Specimens in groups II to IX were cut in the middle and beveled 45 degrees. Group III was then treated with methyl methacrylate (the liquid part of Unifast TRAD) for 180 seconds. Group IV was treated with Rebase II adhesive according to the manufacturer's instructions. Groups V to IX were treated with methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate at various concentrations (75: 25, 50: 50, 25: 75% v/v, respectively) for 15 seconds. They were then repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin (Unifast TRAD). A three-point loading test was performed using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's analysis at p < 0.05 were used for statistical comparison. Failure analysis was then recorded for each specimen. The morphological changes in untreated and treated specimens were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Results: The flexural strengths of groups III to IX were significantly higher than that of group II (p < 0.05). The flexural strengths of groups IV to IX showed no significant difference among them (p > 0.05). All specimens in groups V to IX showed 100% cohesive failure, while groups II, III, and IV showed cohesive failure of 10%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. From scanning electron micrographs, the application of methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate solutions on heat-polymerized acrylic resin resulted in a 3D honeycomb appearance, while specimens treated with methyl methacrylate and Rebase II adhesive developed shallow pits and small crest patterns, respectively. Conclusion: Treating surfaces with methyl formate, methyl acetate, and a mixture of methyl formate-methyl acetate solutions significantly enhanced the flexural strength of heat-polymerized acrylic denture base resin that had been repaired with autopolymerized acrylic resin.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 199
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of pre-processing methods on bond strength between acrylic resin teeth and acrylic denture base resin
    Kurt, Murat
    Sarac, Yakup Sinasi
    Ural, Cagri
    Sarac, Duygu
    [J]. GERODONTOLOGY, 2012, 29 (02) : E357 - E362
  • [42] Tensile Bond Strength of Acrylic Resin Teeth to Denture Base Repair Resin
    Stoia, Adelina Elena
    Sinescu, Cosmin
    Negrutiu, Meda
    Enescu, Marius
    Rominu, Roxana
    Pielmusi, Mircea
    Tudor, Anca
    Rominu, Mihai
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS, SYSTEMS, CIRCUITS AND DEVICES, 2010, : 337 - +
  • [43] Composition and effect of denture base resin surface primers for reline acrylic resins
    Arima, T
    Nikawa, H
    Hamada, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 75 (04): : 457 - 462
  • [44] Effect of methyl methacrylate monomer on bond strength of denture base resin to acrylic teeth
    Marra, Julie
    Paleari, Andre Gustavo
    Pero, Ana Carolina
    de Souza, Raphael Freitas
    Barbosa, Debora Barros
    Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2009, 29 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [45] Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Denture Base Resins to Acrylic Resin Teeth: Effect of Thermocycling
    Marra, Julie
    de Souza, Raphael Freitas
    Barbosa, Debora Barros
    Pero, Ana Carolina
    Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 18 (05): : 438 - 443
  • [46] Effect of reinforcement wire on repaired denture base resin.
    Kouno, H.
    Ohkubo, C.
    Aoki, T.
    Osada, T.
    Kawamura, N.
    Hosoi, T.
    Shimizu, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B188 - B188
  • [47] Evaluation of Flexural Resistance of a Denture Base Acrylic Resin Reinforced with Glass Fiber and With Composite Resin
    da Silva, Lucas Hian
    de Castro, Humberto Lago
    Tango, Rubens Nisie
    de Arruda Paes Junior, Tarcisio Jose
    Kimpara, Estevao Tomomitsu
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 18 (03): : 107 - 110
  • [48] Effect of Surface Treatments with Plasma and Chemical Bond on Shear Bond Strength of Acrylic Denture Teeth to Flexible and Heat-Cured Denture Base Material: An In Vitro Study
    Abood, Ghazwan A.
    Mohammed, Ali A.
    Abdullah, Zainab S.
    Fatalla, Abdalbseet A.
    [J]. DENTAL HYPOTHESES, 2024, 15 (01): : 8 - 10
  • [49] Effect of Disinfection on the Bond Strength between Denture Teeth and Microwave-Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base
    Matos, Adaias O.
    Costa, Josiane O.
    Beline, Thamara
    Ogawa, Erika S.
    Assuncao, Wirley G.
    Mesquita, Marcelo F.
    Consani, Rafael X.
    Barao, Valentim A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (02): : 169 - 176
  • [50] Effect of Chemical and Microwave Disinfection on the Surface Microhardness of Acrylic Resin Denture Teeth
    Vasconcelos, Ligia Regina
    Xediek Consani, Rafael Leonardo
    Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
    Coelho Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (04): : 298 - 303