Hypoglycaemia events with iGlarLixi versus premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes advancing from basal insulin: An analysis of the SoliMix trial

被引:0
|
作者
McCrimmon, Rory J. [1 ]
Home, Philip [2 ]
Cheng, Alice [3 ]
Giorgino, Francesco [4 ]
Fonseca, Vivian [5 ]
Souhami, Elisabeth [6 ]
Alvarez, Agustina [7 ]
Picard, Pascaline [8 ]
Rosenstock, Julio [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Med, Div Syst Med, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Emergency & Organ Transplantat, Sect Internal Med Endocrinol Androl & Metab Dis, Bari, Italy
[5] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] Sanofi, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[8] IVIDATA Life Sci, Levallois Perret, France
[9] Dallas Diabet Res Ctr Med City, Dallas, TX USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2022年 / 24卷 / 12期
关键词
BIAsp; 30; fixed-ratio combination; hypoglycaemia; iGlarLixi; SoliMix; type; 2; diabetes; GLARGINE PLUS LIXISENATIDE; FIXED-RATIO COMBINATION; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; EFFICACY; THERAPY; MECHANISMS; IMPACT; ADHERENCE; METFORMIN; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims To explore details of the incidence and rates of daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, levels of hypoglycaemia, and relationship to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), when comparing iGlarLixi versus premixed biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in the SoliMix randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods This exploratory analysis of SoliMix used logistic regression and negative binomial regression analyses to assess between-treatment differences in the incidence and rates of hypoglycaemia by time of day. A negative binomial model was used to derive estimated annualized hypoglycaemia rates as a function of HbA1c. Results iGlarLixi was associated with lower incidence and rates of American Diabetes Association Level 2 (<54 mg/dL [<3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia during both night and day versus BIAsp 30. Incidence and rates of Level 1 (<70 to >= 54 mg/dL [<3.9 to >= 3.0 mmol/L]) hypoglycaemia were also mostly shown to be reduced with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30. Severe (Level 3) events were too few for analysis (n = 3). iGlarLixi was associated with lower modelled event rates of Level 2 and Level 1 hypoglycaemia over a wide range of HbA1c levels versus BIAsp 30. Conclusions These results show that the lower HbA1c levels and weight benefit seen with iGlarLixi versus premixed BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes advancing their basal insulin therapy in the SoliMix trial are also accompanied by a lower risk of hypoglycaemia at any time of day and across a broad range of HbA1c levels.
引用
收藏
页码:2391 / 2399
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biphasic insulin aspart 30, a premix analogue, is an effective and well-tolerated starter insulin in type 2 diabetes
    Morozova, A
    Sayfullina, M
    Vedeneeva, L
    Al Tayar, B
    Sokolovskaya, V
    Tarasov, A
    Kazakova, E
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A311 - A311
  • [22] Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus have lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia on biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) than on biphasic human insulin-30 (BHI30): data from the REACH study
    McNally, PG
    Nelson, G
    Fitch, M
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 : A327 - A327
  • [23] Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus human premix insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in a Spanish setting
    Tucker, D.
    Valentine, W. J.
    Nielsen, S.
    Townsend, C.
    Kotchie, R.
    Scheijbeler, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A263 - A263
  • [24] An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of switching from biphasic human insulin 30, insulin glargine, or neutral protamine Hagedorn to biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with type 2 diabetes
    Gupta, Vishal
    Baabbad, Ranya
    Hammerby, Eva
    Nikolajsen, Annie
    Shafie, Asrul Akmal
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 18 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [25] Safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Pakistani population: Results from the A1chieve study
    Hassan, Mohammad Imtiaz
    Aamir, Azizul Hasan
    Miyan, Zahid
    Siddiqui, Laiq Ahmed
    Qureshi, Muhammad Saleem
    Shaikh, Muhammad Zaman
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 62 (09) : 929 - 936
  • [26] Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in clinical reality: Experience from a Dutch practice
    Ligthelm, Robert J.
    DIABETES, 2007, 56 : A540 - A540
  • [27] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INSULIN DEGLUDEC/INSULIN ASPART (IDEGASP) COMPARED WITH BIPHASIC INSULIN ASPART (BIASP 30) IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS FROM A MEXICAN HEALTHCARE PERSPECTIVE
    Sanchez-Pedraza, V
    Hansen, B. B.
    Gundgaard, J.
    Uranga Romano, Garca J.
    Evans, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A672 - A672
  • [28] A 32-Week Randomized Comparison of Stepwise Insulin Intensification of Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp 30) Versus Basal-Bolus Therapy in Insulin-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Linjawi, Sultan
    Lee, Byung-Wan
    Tabak, A-mur
    Lovdahl, Susanna
    Werther, Shanti
    Abusnana, Salahedeen
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [29] A 32-Week Randomized Comparison of Stepwise Insulin Intensification of Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp 30) Versus Basal–Bolus Therapy in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Sultan Linjawi
    Byung-Wan Lee
    Ömür Tabak
    Susanna Lövdahl
    Shanti Werther
    Salahedeen Abusnana
    Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [30] Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30), insulin detemir (IDet) and insulin aspart (IAsp) allow patients with type 2 diabetes to reach A1C target: The PRIEFER study
    Liebl, Andreas
    Prager, Rudolf
    Kaiser, Marcel
    Binz, Katharina
    Gallwitz, Baptist
    DIABETES, 2006, 55 : A123 - A123