Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection

被引:9
|
作者
Sekine, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Kotani, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Oka, Daisuke [1 ]
Nakayama, Hiroshi [1 ]
Miyazawa, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Syuto, Takahiro [1 ]
Arai, Seiji [1 ]
Nomura, Masashi [1 ]
Koike, Hidekazu [1 ]
Matsui, Hiroshi [1 ]
Shibata, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Murakami, Masami [3 ]
Suzuki, Kazuhiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, 3-39-22 Showa Machi, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Div Community & Family Med, Dept Clin Lab Med, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Gunma Univ, Dept Clin Lab Med, Grad Sch Med, Maebashi, Gumma, Japan
关键词
Bacterial infections; Biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Cytokines; Endotoxins; Flank pain; Presepsin; Urinary tract infection; Sepsis; procalcitonin; SEPSIS; PROCALCITONIN; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-021-00906-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Recently, presepsin has been reported to be a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis and evaluation of prognosis in septic patients. However, few reports have evaluated its usefulness in patients with urinary tract infections (UTI). This study aimed to evaluate whether presepsin could be a valuable marker for detecting severe sepsis, and whether it could predict the therapeutic course in patients with UTI compared with markers already used: procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods From April 2014 to December 2016, a total of 50 patients with urinary tract infections admitted to Gunma university hospital were enrolled in this study. Vital signs, presepsin, PCT, CRP, white blood cell (WBC) count, causative agents of urinary-tract infections, and other data were evaluated on the enrollment, third, and fifth days. The patients were divided into two groups: with (n = 11) or without (n = 39) septic shock on the enrollment day, and with (n = 7) or without (n = 43) sepsis on the fifth day, respectively. Presepsin was evaluated as a biomarker for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or septic shock. Results Regarding the enrollment day, there was no significant difference of presepsin between the SIRS and non-SIRS groups (p = 0.276). The median value of presepsin (pg/mL) was significantly higher in the septic shock group (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that presepsin (>= 500 pg/ml) was an independent risk factor for septic shock (p = 0.007). ROC curve for diagnosing septic shock indicated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881 for presepsin (vs. 0.690, 0.583, and 0.527 for PCT, CRP and WBC, respectively). Regarding the 5th day after admission, the median presepsin value on the enrollment day was significantly higher in the SIRS groups than in the non-SIRS groups (p = 0.006). On the other hand, PCT (>= 2 ng/ml) on the enrollment day was an independent risk factor for SIRS. ROC curve for diagnosing sepsis on the fifth day indicated an AUC of 0.837 for PCT (vs. 0.817, 0.811, and 0.802 for presepsin, CRP, and WBC, respectively). Conclusions This study showed that presepsin may be a good marker for diagnosing septic shock based on admission data in patients with UTI.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sepsis and septic shock associated to female genital tract infection
    Cerna-Barco, Jorge
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2007, 53 (04): : 248 - 257
  • [22] The role of plasma presepsin levels in determining the incidence of septic shock and mortality in patients with sepsis
    Kahveci, Ugur
    Ozkan, Seda
    Melekoglu, Adem
    Usul, Eren
    Ozturk, Gulfer
    Cetin, Esra
    Abatay, Kerim
    Sahin, Ali
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2021, 15 (01): : 123 - 130
  • [23] Urinary microbiota in patients with urinary tract infection
    Ceprnja, M.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 558 : 10 - 11
  • [24] HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70 IN URINARY TRACT INFECTION
    Yilmaz, Alev
    Emre, Sevinc
    Gedikbasi, Asuman
    Ucar, Evren Onay
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 27 (09) : 1749 - 1749
  • [25] Preoperative vaginal microbiome as a predictor of postoperative urinary tract infection
    John A. Occhino
    Jenifer N. Byrnes
    Pei-Ying Wu
    Jun Chen
    Marina R. Walther-Antonio
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [26] Active cytomegalovirus infection in patients with septic shock
    von Mueller, Lutz
    Klemm, Anke
    Weiss, Manfred
    Schneider, Marion
    Suger-Wiedeck, Heide
    Durmus, Nilguen
    Hampl, Walter
    Mertens, Thomas
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 12 (10) : 1517 - 1522
  • [27] Effect of Furosemide on Urinary Oxygenation in Patients with Septic Shock
    Osawa, Eduardo Atsushi
    Cutuli, Salvatore Lucio
    Bitker, Laurent
    Canet, Emmanuel
    Cioccari, Luca
    Iguchi, Naoya
    Lankadeva, Yugeesh R.
    Eastwood, Glenn M.
    Evans, Roger G.
    May, Clive N.
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2019, 48 (04) : 336 - 345
  • [28] Urinary tract infection in diabetic patients
    Bonadio, M
    Meini, M
    Gigli, C
    Longo, B
    Vigna, A
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1999, 63 (04) : 215 - 219
  • [29] Urinary tract infection in surgical patients
    Hashmi, S
    Kelly, E
    Rogers, SO
    Gates, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 186 (01): : 53 - 56
  • [30] Urinary tract infection in geriatric patients
    Matsumoto, T
    Kumazawa, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (3-4) : 269 - 273