Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection

被引:9
|
作者
Sekine, Yoshitaka [1 ]
Kotani, Kazuhiko [2 ]
Oka, Daisuke [1 ]
Nakayama, Hiroshi [1 ]
Miyazawa, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Syuto, Takahiro [1 ]
Arai, Seiji [1 ]
Nomura, Masashi [1 ]
Koike, Hidekazu [1 ]
Matsui, Hiroshi [1 ]
Shibata, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Murakami, Masami [3 ]
Suzuki, Kazuhiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, 3-39-22 Showa Machi, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Div Community & Family Med, Dept Clin Lab Med, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
[3] Gunma Univ, Dept Clin Lab Med, Grad Sch Med, Maebashi, Gumma, Japan
关键词
Bacterial infections; Biomarkers; C-reactive protein; Cytokines; Endotoxins; Flank pain; Presepsin; Urinary tract infection; Sepsis; procalcitonin; SEPSIS; PROCALCITONIN; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-021-00906-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Recently, presepsin has been reported to be a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of sepsis and evaluation of prognosis in septic patients. However, few reports have evaluated its usefulness in patients with urinary tract infections (UTI). This study aimed to evaluate whether presepsin could be a valuable marker for detecting severe sepsis, and whether it could predict the therapeutic course in patients with UTI compared with markers already used: procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods From April 2014 to December 2016, a total of 50 patients with urinary tract infections admitted to Gunma university hospital were enrolled in this study. Vital signs, presepsin, PCT, CRP, white blood cell (WBC) count, causative agents of urinary-tract infections, and other data were evaluated on the enrollment, third, and fifth days. The patients were divided into two groups: with (n = 11) or without (n = 39) septic shock on the enrollment day, and with (n = 7) or without (n = 43) sepsis on the fifth day, respectively. Presepsin was evaluated as a biomarker for systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or septic shock. Results Regarding the enrollment day, there was no significant difference of presepsin between the SIRS and non-SIRS groups (p = 0.276). The median value of presepsin (pg/mL) was significantly higher in the septic shock group (p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that presepsin (>= 500 pg/ml) was an independent risk factor for septic shock (p = 0.007). ROC curve for diagnosing septic shock indicated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881 for presepsin (vs. 0.690, 0.583, and 0.527 for PCT, CRP and WBC, respectively). Regarding the 5th day after admission, the median presepsin value on the enrollment day was significantly higher in the SIRS groups than in the non-SIRS groups (p = 0.006). On the other hand, PCT (>= 2 ng/ml) on the enrollment day was an independent risk factor for SIRS. ROC curve for diagnosing sepsis on the fifth day indicated an AUC of 0.837 for PCT (vs. 0.817, 0.811, and 0.802 for presepsin, CRP, and WBC, respectively). Conclusions This study showed that presepsin may be a good marker for diagnosing septic shock based on admission data in patients with UTI.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock in patients with urinary tract infection
    Yoshitaka Sekine
    Kazuhiko Kotani
    Daisuke Oka
    Hiroshi Nakayama
    Yoshiyuki Miyazawa
    Takahiro Syuto
    Seiji Arai
    Masashi Nomura
    Hidekazu Koike
    Hiroshi Matsui
    Yasuhiro Shibata
    Masami Murakami
    Kazuhiro Suzuki
    [J]. BMC Urology, 21
  • [2] Presepsin as a predictor of septic shock and mortality in patients with urinary tract infection according to the Sepsis-3 definitions
    Yang, Gi Bi
    Lee, Kyeong Ryong
    Hong, Dae Young
    Park, Sang O.
    Kim, Jong Won
    Kim, Sin Young
    Lee, Young Hwan
    [J]. SIGNA VITAE, 2024, 20 (02) : 70 - 77
  • [3] Risk Factors for Development of Septic Shock in Patients with Urinary Tract Infection
    Hsiao, Chih-Yen
    Yang, Huang-Yu
    Chang, Chih-Hsiang
    Lin, Hsing-Lin
    Wu, Chao-Yi
    Hsiao, Meng-Chang
    Hung, Peir-Haur
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Weng, Cheng-Hao
    Lee, Cheng-Chia
    Yen, Tzung-Hai
    Chen, Yung-Chang
    Wu, Tzu-Chin
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [4] Risk factors for septic shock in older patients with urinary tract infection
    Takaaki Tsuchiya
    Kenta Taito
    Yui Ota
    Shiho Matsuno
    Noriko Yamanaka
    Masatoshi Oka
    Noriyuki Suzuki
    Mitsuyo Itabashi
    Takashi Takei
    [J]. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2025, 29 (3) : 368 - 375
  • [5] Hyperammonemic encephalopathy with septic shock caused by obstructive urinary tract infection
    Kida, Yohei
    Oiwa, Takehiro
    Deguchi, Ryusuke
    [J]. IDCASES, 2018, 14
  • [6] Clinical Effects of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion in Patients With Septic Shock Caused by Urinary Tract Infection
    Suzuki, Yasushi
    Kojika, Masahiro
    Sato, Hisaho
    Inoue, Yoshihiro
    Endo, Shigeatsu
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2019, 23 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [7] The role of presepsin as predictive factor for sepsis in patients with urinary tract infection associated with urinary calculi
    Kim, Y. U.
    Ha, J. G.
    Choi, J. Y.
    Ko, Y. H.
    Song, P. H.
    Moon, K. H.
    Jung, H. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S63 - S63
  • [8] THE ROLE OF PRESEPSIN AS PREDICTIVE FACTOR FOR SEPSIS IN PATIENTS WITH URINARY TRACT INFECTION ASSOCIATED WITH URINARY CALCULI
    Kim, Yeong Uk
    Ha, Jong Gyun
    Jang, Jae Youn
    Choi, Jae Young
    Ko, Young Hwii
    Song, Phil Hyun
    Moon, Ki Hak
    Jung, Hee Chang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E548 - E549
  • [9] THE ROLE OF PRESEPSIN IN IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS
    Trusevich, M.
    Titov, L.
    Gorbich, Y.
    DuBuske, L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : S55 - S55
  • [10] Septic Shock Due to Urinary Tract Infection in an Immunosuppressed Patient Prescribed Dapagliflozin
    Suetani, Yuto
    Arita, Yoh
    Iida, Yoshinori
    Ogasawara, Nobuyuki
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (10)