Assessing gully erosion susceptibility using topographic derived attributes, multi-criteria decision-making, and machine learning classifiers

被引:15
|
作者
Al-Bawi, Ahmed J. [1 ]
Al-Abadi, Alaa M. [1 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Alamri, Abdullah M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basrah, Coll Sci, Dept Geol, Basrah, Iraq
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Ctr Adv Modelling & Geospatial Informat Syst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Earth Observat Ctr, Inst Climate Change, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Geol & Geophys, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Gully erosion; gullies; GIS; remote sensing; MCDM; TOPSIS; Iraq; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; RANDOM FOREST; MODELS; REGION;
D O I
10.1080/19475705.2021.1994024
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is an erosive process that contributes considerably to the shape of the earth's surface and is a major contributor to land degradation and soil loss. This study applied a methodology for mapping gully erosion susceptibility using only topographic related attributes derived from a medium-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) and a hybrid analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for an order of preference by similarity to ideal solutions (TOPSIS) and compare the results with naive Bayes (NB) and support vector machine learning (SVM) algorithms. A transboundary sub-basin in an arid area of southern Iraq was selected as a case study. The performance of the developed models was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results showed that the areas under the ROC were 0.933, 0.936, and 0.955 for AHP-TOPSIS, NB, and SVM with radial basis function, respectively, which indicated that the performance of simply derived AHP-TOPSIS model is similar to sophisticated NB and SVM models. Findings indicated that a medium resolution DEM and AHP-TOPSIS are a promising tool for mapping of gully erosion susceptibility.
引用
收藏
页码:3035 / 3062
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Gully erosion mapping susceptibility in a Mediterranean environment: A hybrid decision-making model
    Hitouri, Sliman
    Meriame, Mohajane
    Ajim, Ali Sk
    Pacheco, Quevedo Renata
    Nguyen-Huy, Thong
    Bao, Pham Quoc
    ElKhrachy, Ismail
    Varasano, Antonietta
    INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2024, 12 (02) : 279 - 297
  • [42] Landslide susceptibility assessment for Uttarakhand, a Himalayan state of India, using multi-criteria decision making, bivariate, and machine learning models
    Chauhan, Vipin
    Gupta, Laxmi
    Dixit, Jagabandhu
    GEOENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [43] Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Technique
    Rauf, Mudassar
    Guan, Zailin
    Sarfraz, Shoaib
    Mumtaz, Jabir
    Almaiman, Sulaiman
    Shehab, Essam
    Jahanzaib, Mirza
    ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY XXXII, 2018, 8 : 343 - 348
  • [44] An extension of fuzzy decision maps for multi-criteria decision-making
    Elomda, Basem Mohamed
    Hefny, Hesham Ahmed
    Hassan, Hesham Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2013, 14 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [45] Recommendation of Machine Learning Techniques for Software Effort Estimation using Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Kumar, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 30 (02) : 221 - 241
  • [46] Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making to optimise solid waste management
    Garcia-Garcia G.
    Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2022, 37
  • [47] Deconstruction plan assessment using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Chen, Z
    Abdullah, A
    Anumba, C
    Li, H
    Xu, Q
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: CHALLENGE OF INNOVATION IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2005, : 465 - 469
  • [48] Improving the Explainability of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Logic
    Yusuf, Hesham
    Yang, Kai
    Panoutsos, George
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, UKCI 2022, 2024, 1454 : 551 - 562
  • [49] Using virtual environments and agent models in multi-criteria decision-making
    Bishop, Ian D.
    Stock, Christian
    Williams, Kathryn J.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [50] SELECTING OPTIMAL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Simunovic, Ljupko
    Grgurevic, Ivan
    Pasagic Skrinjar, Jasmina
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2010, 22 (02): : 105 - 116