Sustainable Decision-Making in Civil Engineering, Construction and Building Technology

被引:118
|
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ,2 ]
Antucheviciene, Jurgita [1 ]
Vilutiene, Tatjana [1 ]
Adeli, Hojjat [3 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Management & Real Estate, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Engn, 470 Hitchcock Hall,2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
civil engineering; construction building technology; sustainability; decision-making; MCDM; literature review; VIBRATION CONTROL; FUZZY APPROACH; MODEL; SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; ENERGY; RANKING; DESIGN; METHODOLOGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su10010014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology can be supported by fundamental scientific achievements and multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) theories. The current paper aims at overviewing the state of the art in terms of published papers related to theoretical methods that are applied to support sustainable evaluation and selection processes in civil engineering. The review is limited solely to papers referred to in the Clarivate Analytic Web of Science core collection database. As the focus is on multiple-criteria decision-making, it aims at reviewing how the papers on MCDM developments and applications have been distributed by period of publishing, by author countries and institutions, and by journals. Detailed analysis of 2015-2017 journal articles from two Web of Science categories (engineering civil and construction building technology) is presented. The articles are grouped by research domains, problems analyzed and the decision-making approaches used. The findings of the current review paper show that MCDM applications have been constantly growing and particularly increased in the last three years, confirming the great potential and prospects of applying MCDM methods for sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENGINEERING IS DECISION-MAKING - TEACH THAT
    WALES, CE
    ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1971, 62 (03): : 278 - &
  • [22] Research on risk analysis and risk decision-making of progress of engineering construction
    Wang, X.J.
    2001, Wuhan University Journals Press (34):
  • [23] Group Decision-making Oriented Civil Engineering Undergraduate Education Reform in China
    Huang, Chunying
    Wang, Xiaoming
    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATION II, PTS 1-3, 2012, 591-593 : 2180 - 2185
  • [24] MEDICAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DECISION-MAKING TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE NORMS OF CIVIL LAW
    Hnatchuk, Yelyzaveta
    Hovorushchenko, Tetiana
    Shteinbrekher, Daria
    Boyarchuk, Artem
    Kysil, Tetiana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SECURITY, 2023, 15 (01): : 77 - 88
  • [25] DECISION-MAKING FOR URBAN TECHNOLOGY
    LAMBRIGHT, WH
    POLICY SCIENCES, 1980, 11 (03) : 329 - 341
  • [27] Multi-criteria decision-making system for sustainable building assessment/certification
    Medineckiene, M.
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Bjork, F.
    Turskis, Z.
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 15 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [28] CONSTRUCTION OF DECISION RULES IN DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS
    GAFT, MG
    PODINOVSKII, VV
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1981, 42 (06) : 806 - 815
  • [29] Supporting decision-making for sustainable nanotechnology
    Malsch I.
    Subramanian V.
    Semenzin E.
    Hristozov D.
    Marcomini A.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2015, 35 (1) : 54 - 75
  • [30] Understanding Evolutionary Societal Decision-making for Sustainable Social Systems Engineering Purposes
    Polojärvi, Dana
    Gambardella, Pascal
    Hayward, John
    INCOSE International Symposium, 2020, 30 (01) : 981 - 1000