Ownership strategies in knowledge-intensive cross-border acquisitions: Comparing Chinese and Indian MNEs

被引:77
|
作者
Scalera, Vittoria G. [1 ]
Mukherjee, Debmalya [2 ]
Piscitello, Lucia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Business Sch, Plantage Muidergracht 12, NL-1018 TV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Akron, Dept Management, 259 South Broadway St, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] DIG Politecn Milano, Via R Lambruschini 4-B, I-20156 Milan, Italy
关键词
Chinese and Indian MNEs; Cross-border acquisitions; Knowledge-intensive industries; Ownership choice; Comparative ownership advantage framework; Institutional distance; International experience; NATIONAL CULTURAL DISTANCE; EMERGING-MARKET; INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE; MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISES; INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION; FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES; ACQUIRING FIRMS; ENTRY MODE; DETERMINANTS; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-018-9616-6
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Drawing on the comparative ownership framework, we perform a comparative analysis of Chinese and Indian multinational enterprises (MNEs)' ownership strategies in knowledge-intensive cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). Specifically, we claim that due to their lower comparative ownership advantage, and the consequent higher information asymmetry, Chinese MNEs are more cautious (than Indian MNEs) in their ownership strategy. We rely on a dataset of acquisitions undertaken by high and medium-high tech Chinese and Indian MNEs worldwide during the period 2000-2014. Results confirm that Chinese MNEs prefer lower equity control than their Indian counterparts. However, such a preference for lower equity decreases with higher home-host institutional distance and host country-specific previous experience. These factors do not seem to modify the ownership preference of Indian MNEs in the same way.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 185
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of local corruption on ownership strategy in cross-border mergers and acquisitions
    Di Guardo, Maria Chiara
    Marrocu, Emanuela
    Paci, Raffaele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (10) : 4225 - 4241
  • [22] Cross-border acquisitions acquisitions by Chinese enterprises: The benefits and disadvantages of political connections
    Schweizer, Denis
    Walker, Thomas
    Zhang, Aoran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2019, 57 : 63 - 85
  • [23] Cross-border acquisitions and the performance of Chinese publicly listed companies
    Li, Xue
    Anwar, Sajid
    Peng, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 141 : 575 - 588
  • [24] Overbidding in cross-border acquisitions: Misperceptions in assessing and valuing knowledge
    Mukherji, Ananda
    Mukherji, Jyotsna
    Dibrell, Clay
    Francis, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2013, 48 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [25] Belt and road initiative and Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitions
    Zhang, Chi
    Kandilov, Ivan
    Walker, Mark
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (06): : 1978 - 1996
  • [26] Dynamics of Chinese emerging multinationals in cross-border mergers and acquisitions
    Ng, Artie W.
    Chatzkel, Jay
    Lau, K. F.
    Macbeth, Douglas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2012, 13 (03) : 416 - 438
  • [27] The Herd Effect and Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions by Chinese Firms
    Liu, Haiyue
    Wang, Yile
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2022, 58 (06) : 1537 - 1549
  • [28] Does political ideology matter in Chinese cross-border acquisitions?
    Jiang, Jiangang
    Zhang, Jianhong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 161
  • [29] Chinese cross-border acquisitions: stylised facts and new directions
    Hu, Shuang
    Gunessee, Saileshsingh
    Liu, Chang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2024, 19 (08) : 2241 - 2263
  • [30] Wealth impact of cross-border US acquisitions of Chinese firms
    Kiymaz, Halil
    Alon, Ilan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (04) : 432 - 451