Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program

被引:29
|
作者
Relevo, Rose [1 ]
Balshein, Howard [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sci Resource Ctr, Oregon Evidence Based Practice Ctr, AHRQ Effect Hlth Care Program, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
Comparative effectiveness reviews; Gray literature; Controlled vocabulary; Avoiding bias; Bibliographic databases; Expert searching; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; SEARCH STRATEGIES; GREY LITERATURE; IDENTIFY REPORTS; MEDLINE; METAANALYSIS; CHALLENGES; DATABASES; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This article discusses search methodology to identify evidence for comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs) as practiced by the Effective Health Care program. Study Design and Setting: Review. Results: Search methods described attempt to overcome the bias inherent in the publication and distribution of clinical evidence. Bibliographic databases and search strategies are discussed with special emphasis on searching for observational studies and harms data. Other techniques described include the use of key articles, citation tracking, hand searching, and personal communications. Strategies for locating gray literature, such as clinical trial protocols and regulatory information, are described. Search reporting and other practical matters are also discussed. Conclusion: Better reporting and further research on search strategies is needed to develop additional evidence-based recommendations. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1177
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条