Differential inequalities in multi-agent coordination and opinion dynamics modeling

被引:15
|
作者
Proskurnikov, Anton V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cao, Ming [4 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft Ctr Syst & Control, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Problems Mech Engn, St Petersburg, Russia
[3] ITMO Univ, Chair Math Phys & Informat Theory, St Petersburg, Russia
[4] Univ Groningen, Engn & Technol Inst ENTEG, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 俄罗斯科学基金会; 俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词
Multi-agent systems; Cooperative control; Distributed algorithm; Complex network; CONSENSUS; SYSTEMS; NETWORKS; STABILITY; AGREEMENT; BEHAVIORS; SEEKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2017.07.065
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Many distributed algorithms for multi-agent coordination employ the simple averaging dynamics, referred to as the Laplacian flow. Besides the standard consensus protocols, examples include, but are not limited to, algorithms for aggregation and containment control, target surrounding, distributed optimization and models of opinion formation in social groups. In spite of their similarities, each of these algorithms has been studied using separate mathematical techniques. In this paper, we show that stability and convergence of many coordination algorithms involving the Laplacian flow dynamics follow from the general consensus dichotomy property of a special differential inequality. The consensus dichotomy implies that any solution to the differential inequality is either unbounded or converges to a consensus equilibrium. In this paper, we establish the dichotomy criteria for differential inequalities and illustrate their applications to multi-agent coordination and opinion dynamics modeling. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 210
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling knowledge dynamics in multi-agent systems based on informants
    Tamargo, Luciano H.
    Garcia, Alejandro J.
    Falappa, Marcelo A.
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2012, 27 (01): : 87 - 114
  • [32] TRANSFER LEARNING FOR MULTI-AGENT COORDINATION
    Vrancx, Peter
    De Hauwere, Yann-Michael
    Nowe, Ann
    ICAART 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 2, 2011, : 263 - 272
  • [33] Coordination in multi-agent RoboCup teams
    Candea, C
    Hu, HS
    Iocchi, L
    Nardi, D
    Piaggio, M
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2001, 36 (02) : 67 - 86
  • [34] Multi-Agent Flag Coordination Games
    Marzagao, David Kohan
    Rivera, Nicolas
    Cooper, Colin
    McBurney, Peter
    Steinhofel, Kathleen
    AAMAS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, : 1442 - 1450
  • [35] Coordination in introspective multi-agent systems
    Charif, Yasmine
    Sabouret, Nicolas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT AGENT TECHNOLOGY (IAT 2007), 2007, : 412 - +
  • [36] Intelligent Multi-agent Coordination and Learning
    Chang, Yu-Cheng
    Dostovalova, Anna
    Lin, Chin-Teng
    Kim, Jijoong
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2019, : 1431 - 1436
  • [37] Multi-Agent Coordination in Dynamic Networks
    Romvary, Jordan J.
    Annaswamy, Anuradha M.
    2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 2802 - 2807
  • [38] Coordination and agreement in multi-agent systems
    Ossowski, Sascha
    COOPERATIVE INFORMATION AGENTS XII, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5180 : 16 - 23
  • [39] Multi-Agent Control Coordination of Microgrid
    Digra, Rohit Kumar
    Pandey, R. K.
    2013 STUDENTS CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS (SCES): INSPIRING ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013,
  • [40] A Model for Multi-Agent Autonomy That Uses Opinion Dynamics and Multi-Objective Behavior Optimization
    Paine, Tyler M.
    Benjamin, Michael R.
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, ICRA 2024, 2024, : 8305 - 8311