Comparison of alternative flue gas dry treatment technologies in waste-to-energy processes

被引:27
|
作者
Dal Pozzo, Alessandro [1 ]
Antonioni, Giacomo [1 ]
Guglielmi, Daniele [1 ]
Stramigioli, Carlo [1 ]
Cozzani, Valerio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum, Dipartimento Ingn Civile Chim Ambientale & Mat, LISES, Via Terracini 28, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Waste incineration; Flue gas treatment; Acid gas removal; Process modelling; Economic analysis; ACID GASES; PLANTS; MSWI; INCINERATION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Acid gases such as HCl and SO2 are harmful both for human health and ecosystem integrity, hence their removal is a key step of the flue gas treatment of Waste-to-Energy (WtE) plants. Methods based on the injection of dry sorbents are among the Best Available Techniques for acid gas removal. In particular, systems based on double reaction and filtration stages represent nowadays an effective technology for emission control. The aim of the present study is the simulation of a reference two-stage (2S) dry treatment system performance and its comparison to three benchmarking alternatives based on single stage sodium bicarbonate injection. A modelling procedure was applied in order to identify the optimal operating configuration of the 25 system for different reference waste compositions, and to determine the total annual cost of operation. Taking into account both operating and capital costs, the 2S system appears the most cost-effective solution for medium to high chlorine content wastes. A Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the robustness of the results. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Waste-to-energy: Europe's landfill alternative
    Pope, Kent
    Solid Waste Technologies, 13 (04):
  • [22] Prioritization of Waste-to-Energy Technologies Associated with the Utilization of Food Waste
    Torres-Lozada, Patricia
    Manyoma-Velasquez, Pablo
    Gaviria-Cuevas, Jenny Fabiana
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [23] Are EU waste-to-energy technologies effective for exploiting the energy in bio-waste?
    Di Maria, Francesco
    Sisani, Federico
    Contini, Stefano
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 230 : 1557 - 1572
  • [24] Dry processes for flue-gas purification
    Trockene Verfahren zur Rauchgasreinigung
    Fritsch, D.A., 2000, Verlag Schmid GmbH, Freiburg, Germany (52)
  • [25] Comparing Waste-to-Energy technologies by applying energy system analysis
    Munster, Marie
    Lund, Henrik
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (07) : 1251 - 1263
  • [26] Comparison of purifying flue gas with selective catalytic and non-catalytic reduction in waste-to-energy plants with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Pickova, E.
    Koci, V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATIONS, 2017, : 239 - 242
  • [27] THE ROLE OF ADVANCED WASTE-TO-ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN LANDFILL MINING
    Aracil, Cristina
    Haro, Pedro
    Gomez-Barea, Alberto
    ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY VIII, 2017, 224 : 403 - 409
  • [28] Life cycle comparison of waste-to-energy alternatives for municipal waste treatment in Chilean Patagonia
    Bezama, Alberto
    Douglas, Carla
    Mendez, Jacqueline
    Szarka, Nora
    Munoz, Edmundo
    Navia, Rodrigo
    Schock, Steffen
    Konrad, Odorico
    Ulloa, Claudia
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2013, 31 (10) : 67 - 74
  • [29] An Argument for Developing Waste-to-Energy Technologies in Saudi Arabia
    Nizami, Abdul-Sattar
    Rehan, Mohammad
    Ouda, Omar K. M.
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Sadef, Yumna
    Iqbal, Tariq
    Ismail, Iqbal M. I.
    PRES15: PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2015, 45 : 337 - 342
  • [30] Efficient waste-to-energy system as a contribution to clean technologies
    Pavlas, Martin
    Tous, Michal
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2009, 11 (01) : 19 - 29