Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population

被引:79
|
作者
Huang, Yinglong [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Wei [1 ]
Su, Bingzhong [2 ]
Zhi, Fachao [1 ]
Liu, Side [1 ]
Bai, Yang [1 ]
Jiang, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Nanfang Hosp, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, Hohhot 010050, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal adenoma; Polypectomy; Recurrence; Surveillance; SOCIETY-TASK-FORCE; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; CONSENSUS UPDATE; RISK-FACTORS; MISS RATE; CANCER; GUIDELINES; RATES; ASSOCIATION; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-010-0227-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Repeat colonoscopy is often performed within a short time after polypectomy due to the fear that colorectal adenomas were missed during the initial colonoscopy or that new adenomas have developed. The aim of this study was to estimate the actual recurrence rate of adenoma and its association with the length of the surveillance interval after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population. A total of 1356 patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy and completing three or more surveillence colonoscopies between 1976 and 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. The recurrence rates of adenoma and advanced adenoma and surveillance intervals after polypectomy were identified based on the features of adenomas detected on initial colonoscopy. The recurrence rates of advanced adenoma in patients with non-advanced adenoma on the initial colonoscopy were 0.9, 3.9, 5.8, and 29.2% during surveillance intervals of 1-3, 3-5, 5-10, and 10-20 years post-initial colonoscopy; for patients with advanced adenoma on the initial colonoscopy, the recurrence rates were 3.8, 13.1, 34.7, and 52.0% during the same surveillance intervals, respectively. Older age (p < 0.05 for trend) and male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-3.53] were significantly associated with recurrence for advanced adenoma, as were the size and number of baseline adenoma (p < 0.05 for trend), tubulovillous, villous adenoma (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.24-5.32), and high-grade dysplasia (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.42). When 5% of patients had recurring advanced adenoma, the surveillance interval was estimated to be 6.9 (95% CI 6.3-12.2) years in the low-risk group and 3.0 (95% CI 2.7-3.2) years in the high-risk group. Among our patient group, the recurrence of advanced adenoma after polypectomy increased with the length of the surveillance interval. Based on our results, a 3-year follow-up of patients after polypectomy could be effective in preventing the recurrence of advanced adenoma in high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 845
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of Jianpi formulas (健脾剂) in reducing the recurrence of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy:a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    XIAO Jing
    SONG Danlei
    LIANG Caiming
    HE Yinuo
    ZHENG Weifang
    WU Xiaqiu
    Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2025, 45 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [22] Fecal Fusobacterium nucleatum as a predictor for metachronous colorectal adenoma after endoscopic polypectomy
    Xue, Jin-Hui
    Xie, Yuan-Hong
    Zou, Tian-Hui
    Qian, Yun
    Kang, Zi-Ran
    Zhou, Cheng-Bei
    Pan, Si-Yuan
    Xia, Tian-Xue
    Chen, Ying-Xuan
    Fang, Jing-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (10) : 2841 - 2849
  • [23] Utilization of Surveillance after Polypectomy in the Medicare Population - A Cohort Study
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Fedewa, Stacey
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    Virgo, Katherine S.
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [24] Cost effectiveness of risk-related surveillance after colorectal polypectomy
    Nusko, G
    Mansmann, U
    Welke, J
    Kirchner, T
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (04) : A476 - A476
  • [25] Adenoma recurrence is independent of polypectomy method: A comparison of hot biopsy forceps and snare polypectomy
    Bozdech, JM
    Bozdech, JF
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (05) : AB248 - AB248
  • [26] Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy
    Kasugai K.
    Ogasawara N.
    Sasaki M.
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 4 (6) : 355 - 363
  • [27] Development and Evaluation of a Surveillance System for Follow-Up After Colorectal Polypectomy
    Wu, Lianlian
    Shi, Conghui
    Li, Jia
    Dong, Zehua
    Zhou, Wei
    Yin, Anning
    Li, Yanxia
    Deng, Yunchao
    Xu, Ming
    Hu, Shan
    Pan, Jie
    Ai, Yaowei
    Liu, Jun
    Zhu, Yijie
    Tao, Xiao
    Wang, Junxiao
    Du, Hongliu
    Zeng, Xiaoquan
    Yu, Honggang
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (09) : E2334822
  • [28] Colorectal cancer surveillance after colon cancer resection and post-polypectomy
    Sarwar, N.
    Collins, P. D.
    Watson, A. J. M.
    INTESTINAL DISORDERS, 2009, 164 : 157 - 175
  • [29] Novel microbiome signatures for non-invasive diagnosis of adenoma recurrence after colonoscopic polypectomy
    Liang, Jessie Qiaoyi
    Zeng, Yao
    Kwok, Grace
    Cheung, Chun Pan
    Suen, Bing Yee
    Ching, Jessica Y. L.
    To, Ka Fai
    Yu, Jun
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    Ng, Siew Chien
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 55 (07) : 847 - 855
  • [30] NOVEL MICROBIOME SIGNATURES FOR NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMA RECURRENCE AFTER COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY
    Liang, Jessie Qiaoyi
    Zeng, Yao
    Kwok, Grace H.
    Cheung, Chun Pan
    Suen, Bing-Yee
    Ching, Jessica Y.
    To, Ka Fai
    Yu, Jun
    Chan, Francis K.
    Ng, Siew C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S309 - S309