Prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor breast cancer: a systematic review

被引:31
|
作者
de Ruijter, Tim C. [1 ,2 ]
van der Heide, Frank [1 ]
Smits, Kim M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aarts, Maureen J. [1 ,2 ]
van Engeland, Manon [2 ,3 ]
Heijnen, Vivianne C. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Div Med Oncol, POB 5800, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, GROW, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Biomarkers; DNA methylation; Breast cancer; Hormone receptor positive; Oestrogen receptor positive; Luminal breast cancer; Prognosis; Promoter CpG island methylation; Survival; BRCA1 PROMOTER METHYLATION; POPULATION-BASED VALIDATION; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; POOR-PROGNOSIS; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; SERUM DNA; POTENTIAL BIOMARKER; RASSF1A METHYLATION; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; MULTIPLE GENES;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-020-1250-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, differentiating between patients with a low and a high risk of recurrence is an ongoing challenge. In current practice, prognostic clinical parameters are used for risk prediction. DNA methylation markers have been proven to be of additional prognostic value in several cancer types. Numerous prognostic DNA methylation markers for breast cancer have been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE to assess the number and level of evidence of published DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To obtain an overview of the reporting quality of the included studies, all were scored according to the REMARK criteria that were established as reporting guidelines for prognostic biomarker studies. Results: A total of 74 studies were identified reporting on 87 different DNA methylation markers. Assessment of the REMARK criteria showed variation in reporting quality of the studies. Eighteen single markers and one marker panel were studied in multiple independent populations. Hypermethylation of the markers RASSF1, BRCA, PITX2, CDH1, RARB, PCDH10 and PGR, and the marker panel GSTP1, RASSF1 and RARB showed a statistically significant correlation with poor disease outcome that was confirmed in at least one other, independent study. Conclusion: This systematic review provides an overview on published prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and identifies eight markers that have been independently validated. Analysis of the reporting quality of included studies suggests that future research on this topic would benefit from standardised reporting guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DNA methylation markers for endometrial cancer detection in minimally invasive samples: a systematic review
    van den Helder, Rianne
    Wever, Birgit M. M.
    van Trommel, Jip A.
    Ket, Johannes C. F.
    Bleeker, Maaike C. G.
    Steenbergen, Renske D. M.
    van Trommel, Nienke E.
    EPIGENOMICS, 2020, 12 (18) : 1661 - 1672
  • [22] Methylation markers for prostate cancer prognosis: a systematic review
    Chao, Chun
    Chi, Margaret
    Preciado, Melissa
    Black, Mary Helen
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (09) : 1615 - 1641
  • [23] Methylation markers for prostate cancer prognosis: a systematic review
    Chun Chao
    Margaret Chi
    Melissa Preciado
    Mary Helen Black
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2013, 24 : 1615 - 1641
  • [24] Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: A systematic review of'the literature
    Althuis, MD
    Fergenbaum, JH
    Garcia-Closas, M
    Brinton, LA
    Madigan, MP
    Sherman, ME
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2004, 13 (10) : 1558 - 1568
  • [25] Prognostic markers other than hormone receptors in breast cancer
    Fleisher, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIGAND ASSAY, 1998, 21 (01): : 41 - 46
  • [26] DNA Methylation Markers for Breast Cancer Detection in the Developing World
    Downs, Bradley M.
    Mercado-Rodriguez, Claudia
    Cimino-Mathews, Ashley
    Chen, Chuang
    Yuan, Jing-Ping
    Van Den Berg, Eunice
    Cope, Leslie M.
    Schmitt, Fernando
    Tse, Gary M.
    Ali, Syed Z.
    Meir-Levi, Danielle
    Sood, Rupali
    Li, Juanjuan
    Richardson, Andrea L.
    Mosunjac, Marina B.
    Rizzo, Monica
    Tulac, Suzana
    Kocmond, Kriszten J.
    de Guzman, Timothy
    Lai, Edwin W.
    Rhees, Brian
    Bates, Michael
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    Gabrielson, Edward
    Harvey, Susan C.
    Umbricht, Christopher B.
    Visvanathan, Kala
    Fackler, Mary Jo
    Sukumar, Saraswati
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (21) : 6357 - 6367
  • [27] Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review
    Raut, Janhavi R.
    Guan, Zhong
    Schrotz-King, Petra
    Brenner, Hermann
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [28] Fecal DNA methylation markers for detecting stages of colorectal cancer and its precursors: a systematic review
    Janhavi R. Raut
    Zhong Guan
    Petra Schrotz-King
    Hermann Brenner
    Clinical Epigenetics, 2020, 12
  • [29] Prognostic models for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Minh Tung Phung
    Tin, Sandar Tin
    Elwood, J. Mark
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [30] Prognostic models for breast cancer: a systematic review
    Minh Tung Phung
    Sandar Tin Tin
    J. Mark Elwood
    BMC Cancer, 19