Comparing Interaction and Use of Space in Traditional and Innovative Classrooms

被引:4
|
作者
Gurzynski-Weiss, Laura [1 ]
Long, Avizia Y. [1 ]
Solon, Megan [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
classroom language learning; classroom space design; instructed SLA; language learning context; teaching with technology; FACE-TO-FACE; ACQUISITION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1353/hpn.2015.0028
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Despite myriad changes to language teaching methods over time, university-level classroom spaces have largely remained the same until now. Recent innovations in classroom space design center on technological advances, include movable furniture and coffee-shop style rooms, and are believed to facilitate language learning in several ways. Specifically, compared to traditional classrooms, innovative spaces are designed in the hope of decreasing pre-task setup, increasing student-centered interaction, and facilitating collaborative work with multiple partners features believed to be important for classroom learning. However, whether or not such features are present in these innovative spaces, or more so than in traditional classrooms, has yet to be tested empirically. This study set out to compare student interaction and the use of space in traditional and innovative classrooms, examining the presence of the aforementioned features. Data collected from university Spanish language and linguistic courses demonstrate that while some differences in use of space and interaction were observed when lessons in traditional and innovative classrooms were compared, notable differences were only present when the instructor was teaching all sections of a course in an innovative classroom and had adapted his/her lesson plans accordingly. Implications for language teaching, instructed language acquisition, and classroom space design are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 78
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on interaction in language classrooms
    Cambra, Margarida
    CULTURA Y EDUCACION, 2013, 25 (04): : 429 - 439
  • [42] Interaction in university classrooms in Spain
    Alvarez-Alvarez, Carmen
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LIFELONG LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP FOR ALL (ICLEL 2017), 2017, : 86 - 97
  • [43] Is newer always better? Comparing traditional and innovative methods to generate a patient-centred conceptual model
    Humphrey, Louise
    Willgoss, Thomas
    Trigg, Andrew
    Kane, Mary
    Kitchen, Helen
    Meysner, Stephanie
    Dickinson, Sally
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [44] Actual versus implied physics students: How students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics
    Boe, Maria Vetleseter
    Henriksen, Ellen Karoline
    Angell, Carl
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2018, 102 (04) : 649 - 667
  • [45] Socioeconomic Drivers of Hunting Efficiency and Use of Space By Traditional Amazonians
    Nunes, Andre Valle
    Oliveira-Santos, Luiz Gustavo R.
    Santos, Braulio A.
    Peres, Carlos A.
    Fischer, Erich
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2020, 48 (03) : 307 - 315
  • [46] Socioeconomic Drivers of Hunting Efficiency and Use of Space By Traditional Amazonians
    André Valle Nunes
    Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira-Santos
    Bráulio A. Santos
    Carlos A. Peres
    Erich Fischer
    Human Ecology, 2020, 48 : 307 - 315
  • [47] Comparing Use of Sonopet Ultrasonic Bone Aspirator to Traditional Instrumentation for Endoscopic Suturectomy
    Premaratne, Ishani D.
    Kocharian, Gary
    Thomas, Charlene
    Rabbin-Birnbaum, Corinne
    Imahiyerobo, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2020, 231 (04) : S178 - S178
  • [48] Land use and income diversification: comparing traditional and colonist populations in the Brazilian Amazon
    Caviglia-Harris, JL
    Sills, EO
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 32 (03) : 221 - 237
  • [49] Traditional tools with innovative projections
    Juric, Victor Hugo Sajoza
    VIRTUALIDAD EDUCACION Y CIENCIA, 2023, 14 (27): : 6 - 7
  • [50] Traditional and innovative in organizational psychology
    Kochetova, Tatiana
    ORGANIZATSIONNAYA PSIKOLOGIYA, 2019, 9 (04): : 222 - 225