Applications of machine learning in decision analysis for dose management for dofetilide

被引:24
|
作者
Levy, Andrew E. [1 ]
Biswas, Minakshi [1 ]
Weber, Rachel [2 ]
Tarakji, Khaldoun [3 ]
Chung, Mina [3 ]
Noseworthy, Peter A. [4 ]
Newton-Cheh, Christopher [5 ,6 ]
Rosenberg, Michael A. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Colorado Sch Publ Hlth, Div Biostat & Informat, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Ctr Atrial Fibrillat, Sect Cardiac Pacing & Electrophysiol, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deli, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Colorado Ctr Personalized Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; REINFORCEMENT; GAME; GO;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0227324
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Initiation of the antiarrhythmic medication dofetilide requires an FDA-mandated 3 days of telemetry monitoring due to heightened risk of toxicity within this time period. Although a recommended dose management algorithm for dofetilide exists, there is a range of real-world approaches to dosing the medication. Methods and results In this multicenter investigation, clinical data from the Antiarrhythmic Drug Genetic (AAD-G EN) study was examined for 354 patients undergoing dofetilide initiation. Univariate logistic regression identified a starting dofetilide dose of 500 mcg (OR 5.0, 95%CI 2.5-10.0, p<0.001) and sinus rhythm at the start of dofetilide loading (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.8-4.2, p<0.001) as strong positive predictors of successful loading. Any dose-adjustment during loading (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.12-0.31, p<0.001) and a history coronary artery disease (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.59, p<0.001) were strong negative predictors of successful dofetilide loading. Based on the observation that any dose adjustment was a significant negative predictor of successful initiation, we applied multiple supervised approaches to attempt to predict the dose adjustment decision, but none of these approaches identified dose adjustments better than a probabilistic guess. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis identified 8 clusters as a reasonable data reduction method. These 8 clusters were then used to define patient states in a tabular reinforcement learning model trained on 80% of dosing decisions. Testing of this model on the remaining 20% of dosing decisions revealed good accuracy of the reinforcement learning model, with only 16/410 (3.9%) instances of disagreement. Conclusions Dose adjustments are a strong determinant of whether patients are able to successfully initiate dofetilide. A reinforcement learning algorithm informed by unsupervised learning was able to predict dosing decisions with 96.1% accuracy. Future studies will apply this algorithm prospectively as a data-driven decision aid.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning applications for COVID-19 outbreak management
    Heidari, Arash
    Navimipour, Nima Jafari
    Unal, Mehmet
    Toumaj, Shiva
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2022, 34 (18): : 15313 - 15348
  • [32] Applications of Machine Learning in Knowledge Management System: A Comprehensive Review
    Simon, Casper Gihes Kaun
    Jhanjhi, Noor Zaman
    Goh, Wei Wei
    Sukumaran, Sanath
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 21 (02)
  • [33] Machine Learning in Disaster Management: Recent Developments in Methods and Applications
    Linardos, Vasileios
    Drakaki, Maria
    Tzionas, Panagiotis
    Karnavas, Yannis L.
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2022, 4 (02): : 446 - 473
  • [34] Applications of Entropy in Data Analysis and Machine Learning: A Review
    Sepulveda-Fontaine, Salome A.
    Amigo, Jose M.
    ENTROPY, 2024, 26 (12)
  • [35] Singularity for Machine Learning Applications - Analysis of Performance Impact
    Jordan, Bruce R., Jr.
    Barrett, David
    Burke, David
    Jardin, Patrick
    Littrell, Amelia
    Monticciolo, Paul
    Newey, Michael
    Piou, Jean
    Warner, Kara
    2019 IEEE HIGH PERFORMANCE EXTREME COMPUTING CONFERENCE (HPEC), 2019,
  • [36] Extreme learning machine for ranking: Generalization analysis and applications
    Chen, Hong
    Peng, Jiangtao
    Zhou, Yicong
    Li, Luoqing
    Pan, Zhibin
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2014, 53 : 119 - 126
  • [37] Machine Learning for Software Analysis: Models, Methods, and Applications
    Bennaceur, Amel
    Meinke, Karl
    MACHINE LEARNING FOR DYNAMIC SOFTWARE ANALYSIS: POTENTIALS AND LIMITS, 2018, 11026 : 3 - 49
  • [38] Bibliometric Analysis of Machine Learning Applications in Ischemia Research
    Abdelwahab, Siddig Ibrahim
    Taha, Manal Mohamed Elhassan
    Alfaifi, Hassan Ahmad
    Farasani, Abdullah
    Hassan, Waseem
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (10)
  • [39] Applications of machine learning in ion beam analysis of materials
    da Silva, Tiago Fiorini
    JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY A, 2025, 43 (02):
  • [40] Differential impedance analysis - Extensions and applications in machine learning
    Voss, Leonard
    Liedtke, Alfred
    Martin, Robert J.
    ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 500