Spatial variability of sulfate reduction in a shallow aquifer

被引:12
|
作者
Musslewhite, Chris L.
Swift, Don
Gilpen, Johnnie
McInerney, Michael J.
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Norman, OK 73071 USA
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Oceans Earth & Atmospher Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Oklahoma City, OK 73109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01392.x
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The distribution and metabolic activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in a shallow, suboxic aquifer were studied. A radioimaging technique was used to visualize and quantify the activity of sulfate reducers in sediments at a centimetre-level scale. The distribution of SRB metabolic activity was heterogeneous with areas showing little activity far outnumbering areas with high activity. Variation in sulfate-reducing activity was not statistically correlated with variation in depth, bacterial numbers, or the following sediment properties: sediment type (sand, peat or silt), grain size, permeability and hydraulic conductivity. Sulfate-reducing bacteria activity did vary significantly with sediment porosity (multivariate analysis, r = 0.48). We hypothesized that the small pore sizes associated with sediments with low porosity restricted the ability of SRB to grow to high numbers as well as their access to nutrients. To further explore the relationship between pore size and microbial metabolic activity, columns with varying pore diameters were constructed. Sulfate-reducing bacteria in the columns with the smallest pore diameters had the lowest rates of metabolism and SRB metabolic rates increased as the pore diameter increased. For the aquifer studied, sediment porosities and pore sizes were the main factor controlling SRB activity.
引用
收藏
页码:2810 / 2819
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL GRADIENTS IN AQUIFER OXIDATION-REDUCTION CONDITIONS
    BARCELONA, MJ
    HOLM, TR
    SCHOCK, MR
    GEORGE, GK
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1989, 25 (05) : 991 - 1003
  • [32] Shallow and deep aquifer hydrochemistry and chemical variability of water quality at Shariatpur district, Bangladesh
    Khan, Riaz Hossain
    Hassan, Muhammad Qumrul
    Islam, Mohammad Saiful
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2013, 69 (08) : 2499 - 2512
  • [33] Shallow and deep aquifer hydrochemistry and chemical variability of water quality at Shariatpur district, Bangladesh
    Riaz Hossain Khan
    Muhammad Qumrul Hassan
    Mohammad Saiful Islam
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 69 : 2499 - 2512
  • [34] Spatial and temporal variability of groundwater recharge in a sandstone aquifer in a semiarid region
    Manna, Ferdinando
    Murray, Steven
    Abbey, Daron
    Martin, Paul
    Cherry, John
    Parker, Beth
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (04) : 2187 - 2205
  • [35] Incorporating spatial variability into GIS to estimate nitrate leaching at the aquifer scale
    Gorres, J
    Gold, AJ
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1996, 25 (03) : 491 - 498
  • [36] SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN BIODEGRADATION RATES AS EVIDENCED BY METHANE PRODUCTION FROM AN AQUIFER
    ADRIAN, NR
    ROBINSON, JA
    SUFLITA, JM
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 60 (10) : 3632 - 3639
  • [37] Groundwater Quality: Analysis of Its Temporal and Spatial Variability in a Karst Aquifer
    Castro, Roger Pacheco
    Pacheco Avila, Julia
    Ye, Ming
    Cabrera Sansores, Armando
    GROUNDWATER, 2018, 56 (01) : 62 - 72
  • [38] Effect of the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in aquifer on the numerical simulation of groundwater
    Chen, Yan
    Wu, Ji-Chun
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2005, 16 (04): : 482 - 487
  • [39] Effects of Soil Spatial Variability on Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
    Daryani, K. E.
    Mohamad, H.
    GEOTECHNICAL SAFETY AND RISK V, 2015, : 371 - 376
  • [40] Effect of spatial variability on the behaviour of shallow foundations: Centrifuge study
    Garzon, L. X.
    Caicedo, B.
    Sanchez-Silva, M.
    Phoon, K. K.
    PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, VOL 2, 2018, : 1285 - 1290