Assessment of the aerosol distribution over Indian subcontinent in CMIP5 models

被引:36
|
作者
Sanap, S. D. [1 ]
Ayantika, D. C. [1 ]
Pandithurai, G. [1 ]
Niranjan, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Trop Meteorol, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[2] Andhra Univ, Dept Phys, Waltair 530003, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Aerosol optical depth; CMIP-5; models; Model assessment; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; MONSOON RAINFALL; CLIMATE; SUMMER; TRENDS; VARIABILITY; HIMALAYAS; CLOUDS; EMISSIONS; ALBEDO;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the aerosol distribution over Indian subcontinent as represented in 21 models from Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) simulations, wherein model simulated aerosol optical depth (ADD) is compared with Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer (MOD'S) satellite observations. The objective of the study is to provide an assessment of the capability of various global models, participating in CMIP5 project, in capturing the realistic spatial and temporal distribution of aerosol species over the Indian subcontinent. Results from our analysis show that majority of the CMIP5 models (excepting HADGEM2-ES, HADGEM2-CC) seriously underestimates the spatio-temporal variability of aerosol species over the Indian subcontinent, in particular over Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP). Since IGP region is dominated by anthropogenic activities, high population density, and wind driven transport of dust and other aerosol species. MODIS observations reveal high AOD values over this region. Though the representation of black carbon (BC) loading in many models is fairly good, the dust loading is observed to be significantly low in majority of the models. The presence of pronounced dust activity over northern India and dust being one of the major constituent of aerosol species, the biases in dust loading has a great impact on the AOD of that region. We found that considerable biases in simulating the 850 hPa wind field (which plays important role in transport of dust from adjacent deserts) would be the possible reason for poor representation of dust AOD and in turn total AOD over Indian region in CMIP5 models. In addition, aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) underestimated/overestimated in most of the models. However, spatial distribution of ARF in multi-model ensemble mean is comparable reasonably well with observations with bias in magnitudes. This analysis emphasizes the fundamental need to improve the representation of aerosol species in current state of the art climate models. As reported in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) fourth assessment report (AR4), the level of scientific understanding (LOSU) of climatic impact of aerosols is medium-low. For better understanding of short and long term implications of changing concentrations of aerosol species on climate, it is imperative to have a realistic representation of aerosol distribution over regions with high aerosol loading. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 137
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Assessment of an extended version of the Jenkinson-Collison classification on CMIP5 models over Europe
    Otero, Noelia
    Sillmann, Jana
    Butler, Tim
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 50 (5-6) : 1559 - 1579
  • [43] Indirect Aerosol Effect Increases CMIP5 Models' Projected Arctic Warming
    Chylek, Petr
    Vogelsang, Timothy J.
    Klett, James D.
    Hengartner, Nicholas
    Higdon, Dave
    Lesins, Glen
    Dubey, Manvendra K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (04) : 1417 - 1428
  • [44] Preliminary Assessment of Simulations of Climate Changes over China by CMIP5 Multi-Models
    Xu Ying
    Xu Chong-Hai
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2012, 5 (06) : 489 - 494
  • [45] Evaluation of the Global Climate Models in the CMIP5 over the Tibetan Plateau
    Su, Fengge
    Duan, Xiaolan
    Chen, Deliang
    Hao, Zhenchun
    Cuo, Lan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (10) : 3187 - 3208
  • [46] Reproducibility of precipitation distribution over the tropical oceans in CMIP5 multi-climate models compared to CMIP3
    Hirota, Nagio
    Takayabu, Yukari N.
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2013, 41 (11-12) : 2909 - 2920
  • [47] Climate Drift in the CMIP5 Models
    Gupta, Alexander Sen
    Jourdain, Nicolas C.
    Brown, Jaclyn N.
    Monselesan, Didier
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (21) : 8597 - 8615
  • [48] Precipitation Biases in CMIP5 Models over the South Asian Region
    Raju Pathak
    Sandeep Sahany
    Saroj Kanta Mishra
    S. K. Dash
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [49] Evaluation of CMIP5 Models in the Context of Dynamical Downscaling over Europe
    Jury, Martin W.
    Prein, Andreas F.
    Truhetz, Heimo
    Gobiet, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (14) : 5575 - 5582
  • [50] Precipitation Biases in CMIP5 Models over the South Asian Region
    Pathak, Raju
    Sahany, Sandeep
    Mishra, Saroj Kanta
    Dash, S. K.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)