Dual-task mobility among individuals with chronic stroke: changes in cognitive-motor interference patterns and relationship to difficulty level of mobility and cognitive tasks

被引:27
|
作者
Yang, Lei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lam, Freddy M. [3 ]
Huang, Meizhen [3 ]
He, Chengqi [4 ]
Pang, Marco Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Med Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Kunming, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Disaster Management & Reconstruct, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] West China Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Gait; Cognition; Stroke; Cognitive neuroscience; WORKING-MEMORY; RELIABILITY; GAIT; PERFORMANCE; BALANCE; IMPAIRMENT; VALIDITY; WALKING; ATTENTION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04773-6
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Dual-task mobility performance is compromised alter stroke. AIM: This study evaluated how the difficulty level of mobility and cognitive tasks influenced the cognitive-motor interference pattern among individuals with chronic stroke and whether it differed from age-matched control participants. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: University laboratory. POPULATION: Individuals with chronic stroke and age-matched controls. METHODS: Sixty-one individuals with chronic stroke (mean age: 62.9 +/- 7.8 years) and 32 controls (mean age: 61.0 +/- 7.3 years) performed three mobility tasks (forward walking, obstacle-crossing, backward walking) and two cognitive tasks (serial-3-subtractions, serial-7-subtractions) in single-task and dual-task conditions. time to complete the mobility tasks and correct response rates were recorded. RESULTS: Serial subtractions significantly increased the walking time compared to single-task walking (P<0.00l) without decreasing the correct response rate (P>0.05) in both groups, indicating cognitive-related motor interference. As the difficulty of the walking task was increased (i.e., obstacle crossing), the dual-task effect on the walking time was similar to that observed during forward walking. but the correct response rate significantly decreased (P<0.05), indicating that more attentional resources were allocated to the mobility task. When the walking task difficulty level increased further (i.e., backward walking), an exaggerated increase in the walking time (P<0.001) was observed in both groups, but the stroke group also had a decreased correct response rate (P<0.001), indicative of a mutual interference pattern. The control group, however, maintained the correct response rate (P>0.05) despite the slowed walking speed in this condition (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The degree of dual-task interference and task prioritization strategies are highly specific to the combinations of the walking and cognitive tasks used and are affected by the presence of stroke. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results may provide the basis for establishing assessment tools and creating intervention programs that address dual-task mobility function post-stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis revisited: a dual-task paradigm using wearable inertial sensors and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test
    Kremer, Lea
    Schreff, Lucas
    Hamacher, Daniel
    Oschmann, Patrick
    Rothhammer, Veit
    Keune, Philipp M.
    Mueller, Roy
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [42] Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT)
    Sophie Tasseel-Ponche
    Martine Roussel
    Monica N. Toba
    Thibaud Sader
    Vincent Barbier
    Arnaud Delafontaine
    Jonathan Meynier
    Carl Picard
    Jean-Marc Constans
    Alexis Schnitzler
    Olivier Godefroy
    Alain Pierre Yelnik
    Trials, 24
  • [43] Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT)
    Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie
    Roussel, Martine
    Toba, Monica N.
    Sader, Thibaud
    Barbier, Vincent
    Delafontaine, Arnaud
    Meynier, Jonathan
    Picard, Carl
    Constans, Jean-Marc
    Schnitzler, Alexis
    Godefroy, Olivier
    Yelnik, Alain Pierre
    TRIALS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [44] The relationship between cognitive decline and motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease: A focused mini-review on cognitive-locomotor dual-task interference
    Mihara, Masahito
    NEUROLOGY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 8 (06): : 372 - 377
  • [45] Cognitive-motor dual-task training on gait and balance in stroke patients: meta-analytic report and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Zhang, Lu
    Ma, Jiangping
    Liu, Xiaoqing
    Jin, Aiping
    Wang, Kai
    Yin, Xiaobing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [46] Comparing 16 Different Dual-Tasking Paradigms in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Controls: Working Memory Tasks Indicate Cognitive-Motor Interference
    Leone, Carmela
    Moumdjian, Lousin
    Patti, Francesco
    Vanzeir, Ellen
    Baert, Ilse
    Veldkamp, Renee
    Van Wijmeersch, Bart
    Feys, Peter
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [47] Design, Development, and Testing of an App for Dual-Task Assessment and Training Regarding Cognitive-Motor Interference (CMI-APP) in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Multicenter Pilot Study
    Tacchino, Andrea
    Veldkamp, Renee
    Coninx, Karin
    Brulmans, Jens
    Palmaers, Steven
    Hamalainen, Paivi
    D'hooge, Mieke
    Vanzeir, Ellen
    Kalron, Alon
    Brichetto, Giampaolo
    Feys, Peter
    Baert, Ilse
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2020, 8 (04):
  • [48] Dual-Task Obstacle Crossing Training Could Immediately Improve Ability to Control a Complex Motor Task and Cognitive Activity in Chronic Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
    Amatachaya, Sugalya
    Srisim, Kitiyawadee
    Arrayawichanon, Preeda
    Thaweewannakij, Thiwabhorn
    Amatachaya, Pipatana
    TOPICS IN SPINAL CORD INJURY REHABILITATION, 2019, 25 (03) : 260 - 270