Comparison of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Intravenous and Intramuscular Injection of Ketamine for Children Requiring Sedation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study

被引:0
|
作者
Forouzan, Arash [1 ]
Moezzi, Meisam [1 ]
Aghdam, Vahid [1 ,2 ]
Delirrooyfard, Ali [1 ]
Masoumi, Kambiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Dept Emergency Med, Fac Med, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Ahvaz, Iran
来源
关键词
Children; Efficacy; Emergency Department; Sedation; Ketamine; PEDIATRIC PROCEDURAL SEDATION; EMERGENCY; ANALGESIA; PAIN; AGITATION; RELIEF; IV;
D O I
10.22038/ijp.2018.37034.3226
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Ketamine is an antagonist receptor of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), and phencyclidine derivate sedative agent. Thus the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) injection of Ketamine for sedation procedure of children. Materials and Methods In this randomized clinical trial the patients, 1-6 year-old children referred to Emergency Department of Ahvaz Golestan and Imam Khomeini Hospitals, Ahvaz city, Iran, were divided randomly into two groups (IV and IM groups). Patients in the IV group received ketamine with dose of 1.5 mg/kg intravenously and the patients in the IM group received ketamine with dose of 4 mg/kg intramuscularly. Then efficacy and side effects in both groups were performed every 5 minutes for the first for the first 15 minutes. Results 222 patients with indication for sedation were enrolled. Results showed that in 1st min, most of the patients that received IM ketamine were in level 1 of sedation (67.6 %, n=73); while the majority of patients that received IV ketamine were in level 1 to 3 of sedation (28.9%, 24.6% and 26.3%, respectively) (P<0.001). Moreover, in 5th min, most of the patients that received IV ketamine were in level 6 of sedation (62.3%), while those who received IM ketamine were in level 5 of sedation (52.8%) (P<0.001), which was better in IV group. While in 15th min, we did not find significant differences between the groups (P=0.057). Conclusion The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of IV ketamine in making better sedation levels in pediatric patients for different purpose (medical and para-clinical procedures).
引用
收藏
页码:9391 / 9397
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Double-blind randomized controlled trial of caudal versus intravenous S(+)-ketamine for supplementation of caudal analgesia in children
    Martindale, SJ
    Dix, P
    Stoddart, PA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2004, 92 (03) : 344 - 347
  • [22] Effect of ondansetron on the incidence of vomiting associated with ketamine sedation in children: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Langston, William T.
    Wathen, Joe E.
    Roback, Mark G.
    Bajaj, Lalit
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 52 (01) : 30 - 34
  • [23] Pediatric oncology sedation trial (POST): A double-blind randomized study
    Nagel, Kim
    Willan, Andrew R.
    Lappan, Janie
    Korz, Linda
    Buckley, Norman
    Barr, Ronald D.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2008, 51 (05) : 634 - 638
  • [24] A comparative study of dexmedetomidine and propofol to prevent recovery agitation in adults undergoing procedural sedation with ketamine: A randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Azizkhani, Reza
    Kouhestani, Soheila
    Heydari, Farhad
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 50 : 167 - 172
  • [25] Comparison of the effect of oral pregabalin with intravenous ketamine on reducing acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Ghadami, Negin
    Sarshivi, Farzad
    Barzanji, Arvin
    Nouri, Bijan
    Mohammadi, Zahra
    CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (02) : 216 - 222
  • [26] RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR ENDOSCOPIC SEDATION IN CHILDREN
    TOLIA, V
    FLEMING, SL
    KAUFFMAN, RE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1988, 34 (02) : 172 - 172
  • [27] Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of intramuscular, intravenous and oral methylprednisolone used in the acute exacerbation of childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial
    Ozpenpe, O.
    Aydogan, M.
    Piraneci, R.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 668 - 668
  • [28] Intravenous midazolam as a sedative for colonoscopy: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
    Yuno, K
    Iishi, H
    Tatsuta, M
    Hifumi, K
    Omori, M
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 10 (06) : 981 - 984
  • [29] Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Intravenous Ketamine versus Intravenous Morphine in Reducing Pain of Renal Colic Patients: Double-Blind Clinical Trial Study
    Forouzan, Arash
    Masoumi, Kambiz
    Motamed, Hassan
    Esfahani, Seyed Reza Naji
    Delirrooyfard, Ali
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 14 (04) : 280 - 285
  • [30] Comparison of Nebulized Ketamine to Intravenous Subdissociative Dose Ketamine for Treating Acute and Chronic Painful Conditions in the ED: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trial
    Nguyen, Tommy
    Kun, Karina
    Choudhary, Amulya
    Fassassi, Catsim
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Kabariti, Sarah
    Chen, Aaron
    Lo Verde, Alexandra
    Motov, Sergey
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2023, 136 : 640 - 641