Component Decomposition Analysis for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

被引:24
|
作者
Chen, Shuhan [1 ]
Chang, Chein-, I [2 ,3 ]
Li, Xiaorun [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Maritime Univ, Informat & Technol Coll, Ctr Hyperspectral Imaging Remote Sensing CHIRS, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Remote Sensing Signal & Image Proc Lab, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
关键词
Detectors; Hyperspectral imaging; Sparse matrices; Matrix decomposition; Object detection; Data models; Tensors; Component decomposition analysis (CDA); component decomposition analysis sparsity cardinality-based anomaly detector (CDASC-AD); independent component analysis (ICA); low-rank and sparse representation (LRaSR); principal components analysis (PCA); sparsity cardinality (SC); virtual dimensionality (VD); RX-ALGORITHM; PROJECTION; DIMENSIONALITY; EXTRACTION; SEPARATION; REDUCTION; NUMBER; FILTER; ERROR; RANK;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2021.3117765
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Low-rank and sparse representation (LRaSR)-based approaches have been widely used for anomaly detection (AD). Their central ideas are to minimize the rank of the low-rank space constrained to predetermined values, while using various regularization parameters to control the sparse representation. Three key issues arise from LRaSR. The first is how to determine the constrained rank. The second is an appropriate selection of regularization parameters. The third one is the detector used for AD. This article presents a new but rather simple competing model, called component decomposition analysis (CDA) which represents a data space X as a linear orthogonal decomposition of three components, X = PC $<^>{{m}}$ + IC $<^>{{j}}$ + N with m principal components, PC $<^>{{m}}$ , generated by principal component analysis (PCA) and j independent components, IC $<^>{{j}}$ , generated by independent component analysis (ICA) plus a noise component N. CDA offers several advantages over LRaSR. First, CDA uses well-known component analysis techniques to decompose the dataset without solving constrained optimization problems. Second, the values of m and j can be automatically determined by virtual dimensionality (VD) and a minimax-singular value decomposition (MX-SVD). To better extract anomalies from the IC $<^>{{j}}$ component space, the concept of sparsity cardinality (SC) is further incorporated into CDA to derive a CDASC anomaly detector (CDASC-AD). The experimental results demonstrate that CDASC-AD is very competitive against the LRaSR-based models and performs well in hyperspectral AD.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery
    Chang, CI
    Chiang, SS
    Ginsberg, IW
    [J]. GEO-SPATIAL IMAGE AND DATA EXPLOITATION II, 2001, 4383 : 43 - 50
  • [42] Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection: A Dual Theory of Hyperspectral Target Detection
    Chang, Chein-, I
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [43] HYPERSPECTRAL ANOMALY DETECTION ON THE SPHERE
    Frontera-Pons, Joana
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL ADVANCES IN MULTI-SENSOR ADAPTIVE PROCESSING (CAMSAP 2019), 2019, : 101 - 105
  • [44] Improved morphological component analysis for interference hyperspectral image decomposition
    Wen, Jia
    Zhao, Junsuo
    Wang, Cailing
    [J]. COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 46 : 394 - 402
  • [45] Archetypal Analysis and Structured Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
    Zhao, Genping
    Li, Fei
    Zhang, Xiuwei
    Laakso, Kati
    Chan, Jonathan Cheung-Wai
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [46] A new technique for hyperspectral image analysis with applications to anomaly detection
    Denney, BS
    de Figueiredo, RJP
    [J]. IMAGING SPECTROMETRY VI, 2000, 4132 : 49 - 60
  • [47] Method of Sensitivity Analysis in Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Hyperspectral Images
    Messer, Adam J.
    Bauer, Kenneth W., Jr.
    [J]. ALGORITHMS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY XXIII, 2017, 10198
  • [48] Anomaly Detection Combined with Spectral Function Analysis in Hyperspectral Imagery
    Zhang, Xiaohan
    Yang, Guang
    Yang, Yongbo
    Huang, Junhua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MATERIALS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 80 : 42 - 46
  • [49] A local Mahalanobis-distance method based on tensor decomposition for hyperspectral anomaly detection
    Zhao, Chunhui
    Zhang, Lili
    Cheng, Baozhi
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 34 (05) : 490 - 503
  • [50] Self-Adaptive Low-Rank and Sparse Decomposition for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
    Wang, Qunming
    Zeng, Jiang
    Wu, Hao
    Wang, Jiawen
    Sun, Kaipeng
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 15 : 3672 - 3685