Component Decomposition Analysis for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

被引:24
|
作者
Chen, Shuhan [1 ]
Chang, Chein-, I [2 ,3 ]
Li, Xiaorun [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Maritime Univ, Informat & Technol Coll, Ctr Hyperspectral Imaging Remote Sensing CHIRS, Dalian 116026, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Comp Sci & Elect Engn, Remote Sensing Signal & Image Proc Lab, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
关键词
Detectors; Hyperspectral imaging; Sparse matrices; Matrix decomposition; Object detection; Data models; Tensors; Component decomposition analysis (CDA); component decomposition analysis sparsity cardinality-based anomaly detector (CDASC-AD); independent component analysis (ICA); low-rank and sparse representation (LRaSR); principal components analysis (PCA); sparsity cardinality (SC); virtual dimensionality (VD); RX-ALGORITHM; PROJECTION; DIMENSIONALITY; EXTRACTION; SEPARATION; REDUCTION; NUMBER; FILTER; ERROR; RANK;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2021.3117765
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Low-rank and sparse representation (LRaSR)-based approaches have been widely used for anomaly detection (AD). Their central ideas are to minimize the rank of the low-rank space constrained to predetermined values, while using various regularization parameters to control the sparse representation. Three key issues arise from LRaSR. The first is how to determine the constrained rank. The second is an appropriate selection of regularization parameters. The third one is the detector used for AD. This article presents a new but rather simple competing model, called component decomposition analysis (CDA) which represents a data space X as a linear orthogonal decomposition of three components, X = PC $<^>{{m}}$ + IC $<^>{{j}}$ + N with m principal components, PC $<^>{{m}}$ , generated by principal component analysis (PCA) and j independent components, IC $<^>{{j}}$ , generated by independent component analysis (ICA) plus a noise component N. CDA offers several advantages over LRaSR. First, CDA uses well-known component analysis techniques to decompose the dataset without solving constrained optimization problems. Second, the values of m and j can be automatically determined by virtual dimensionality (VD) and a minimax-singular value decomposition (MX-SVD). To better extract anomalies from the IC $<^>{{j}}$ component space, the concept of sparsity cardinality (SC) is further incorporated into CDA to derive a CDASC anomaly detector (CDASC-AD). The experimental results demonstrate that CDASC-AD is very competitive against the LRaSR-based models and performs well in hyperspectral AD.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anomaly detection algorithm based on wavelet decomposition and vertex component analysis in hyperspectral images
    Meng, Qiang-Qiang
    Yang, Guang
    Sun, Jia-Cheng
    Lei, Zhong-Xiang
    Lu, Shan
    [J]. Guangdianzi Jiguang/Journal of Optoelectronics Laser, 2014, 25 (06): : 1152 - 1157
  • [2] Unmixing component analysis for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery
    Gu, Yanfeng
    Ye, Zhang
    Ying, Liu
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 965 - +
  • [3] Anomaly detection for hyperspectral imagery based on vertex component analysis
    Aerospace TT and C System Laboratory, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
    不详
    [J]. Yuhang Xuebao, 2007, 5 (1262-1265):
  • [4] Independent component analysis for hyperspectral anomaly
    Chen, S. H.
    Li, X. R.
    Xia, C. Q.
    Yu, S. Q.
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, TECHNOLOGIES, AND APPLICATIONS FOR MULTISPECTRAL AND HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGING XXVIII, 2022, 12094
  • [5] Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Data with Matrix Decomposition
    Kucuk, Fatma
    Toreyin, Behcet Ugur
    Celebi, Fatih Vehbi
    [J]. 2018 26TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2018,
  • [6] Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection with Harmonic Analysis and Low-Rank Decomposition
    Xiang, Pei
    Song, Jiangluqi
    Li, Huan
    Gu, Lin
    Zhou, Huixin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [7] Hyperspectral anomaly change detection model based on independent component analysis
    Lin, Yukun
    Wang, Nan
    Zhang, Lifu
    Cen, Yi
    Sun, Xuejian
    Lu, Hanyu
    Tong, Qingxi
    [J]. Yaogan Xuebao/Journal of Remote Sensing, 2019, 23 (06): : 1167 - 1176
  • [8] Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection Using Modified Principal Component Analysis Reconstruction Error
    Vafadar, Maryam
    Ghassemian, Hassan
    [J]. 2017 25TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICEE), 2017, : 1741 - 1746
  • [9] Unsupervised Ensemble-Kernel Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
    Merrill, Nicholas
    Olson, Colin C.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION WORKSHOPS (CVPRW 2020), 2020, : 507 - 515
  • [10] HYPERSPECTRAL ANOMALY DETECTION USING COMPRESSED COLUMNWISE ROBUST PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
    Sun, Weiwei
    Yang, Gang
    Li, Jialin
    Zhang, Dianfa
    [J]. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 6372 - 6375