Creating spatially contiguous yield classes for site-specific management

被引:39
|
作者
Ping, JL [1 ]
Dobermann, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2003.1121
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Annual yield maps are spatially fragmented because of random variation caused by crop management as well as measurement errors. Two approaches for creating maps of spatially contiguous yield classes were evaluated at two irrigated sites. In the first approach, prior-classification interpolation (PCI), grid size was increased from 4, 8, 16, and 32 to 64 m by kriging interpolation before cluster analysis used for mapping yield classes. Choosing a coarse resolution (>16 m) for yield interpolation before spatial classification resulted in maps that did not accurately depict yield patterns, significant decline of the yield variance accounted for, and loss of resolution in areas of sharp yield transitions caused by irrigation or near the field borders. In the second approach, postclassification filtering (PCF), cluster analysis of mean relative yield was conducted on the smallest grid size (4 m), and the classification results were postprocessed using a spatial filtering algorithm with window sizes that were equivalent to the 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-m grid sizes used in PCI. This procedure removed erroneous map fragmentation and created maps of contiguous yield classes while preserving the class means and general yield patterns at high spatial resolution. Window sizes for spatial filtering of yield maps should be in the 30- to 60-m range. Landscape pattern metrics may offer new potential for assessing mapping techniques as well as comparing agricultural production fields with regard to ranking their relative opportunities for site-specific crop management.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fractal analysis of temporal yield variability of crop sequences: Implications for site-specific management
    Eghball, B
    Varvel, GE
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1997, 89 (06) : 851 - 855
  • [22] Site-specific nitrogen management of irrigated maize: Yield and soil residual nitrate effects
    Ferguson, RB
    Hergert, GW
    Schepers, JS
    Gotway, CA
    Cahoon, JE
    Peterson, TA
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2002, 66 (02) : 544 - 553
  • [23] Impact of spatial resolution on the quality of crop yield predictions for site-specific crop management
    Al-Shammari, Dhahi
    Whelan, Brett M.
    Wang, Chen
    Bramley, Robert G., V
    Fajardo, Mario
    Bishop, Thomas F. A.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 310
  • [24] SPHINX: a framework for creating personal, site-specific Web crawlers
    Miller, RC
    Bharat, K
    COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1998, 30 (1-7): : 119 - 130
  • [25] Spatial autoregression modeling of site-specific wheat yield
    Long, DS
    GEODERMA, 1998, 85 (2-3) : 181 - 197
  • [26] Statistical and neural methods for site-specific yield prediction
    Drummond, ST
    Sudduth, KA
    Joshi, A
    Birrell, SJ
    Kitchen, NR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2003, 46 (01): : 5 - 14
  • [27] TESTING OF SITE-SPECIFIC YIELD IN DIFFERENT HARVEST PASSES
    Simonovic, Vojislav
    Markovic, Dragan
    Markovic, Ivana
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2016, 23 (02): : 499 - 503
  • [28] Site-Specific Relationship Between Grain Quality and Yield
    P. Reyns
    P. Spaepen
    J. De Baerdemaeker
    Precision Agriculture, 2000, 2 (3) : 231 - 246
  • [29] TOOLS TO AID MANAGEMENT - THE USE OF SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT
    KINCHELOE, S
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1994, 49 (02) : 43 - 45
  • [30] Map quality for site-specific fertility management
    Mueller, TG
    Pierce, FJ
    Schabenberger, O
    Warncke, DD
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (05) : 1547 - 1558