Creating spatially contiguous yield classes for site-specific management

被引:39
|
作者
Ping, JL [1 ]
Dobermann, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2003.1121
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Annual yield maps are spatially fragmented because of random variation caused by crop management as well as measurement errors. Two approaches for creating maps of spatially contiguous yield classes were evaluated at two irrigated sites. In the first approach, prior-classification interpolation (PCI), grid size was increased from 4, 8, 16, and 32 to 64 m by kriging interpolation before cluster analysis used for mapping yield classes. Choosing a coarse resolution (>16 m) for yield interpolation before spatial classification resulted in maps that did not accurately depict yield patterns, significant decline of the yield variance accounted for, and loss of resolution in areas of sharp yield transitions caused by irrigation or near the field borders. In the second approach, postclassification filtering (PCF), cluster analysis of mean relative yield was conducted on the smallest grid size (4 m), and the classification results were postprocessed using a spatial filtering algorithm with window sizes that were equivalent to the 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-m grid sizes used in PCI. This procedure removed erroneous map fragmentation and created maps of contiguous yield classes while preserving the class means and general yield patterns at high spatial resolution. Window sizes for spatial filtering of yield maps should be in the 30- to 60-m range. Landscape pattern metrics may offer new potential for assessing mapping techniques as well as comparing agricultural production fields with regard to ranking their relative opportunities for site-specific crop management.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Creating decision rules for site-specific weed management
    Gutjahr, C.
    Weis, M.
    Soekefeld, M.
    Ritter, C.
    Moehring, J.
    Buechse, A.
    Piepho, H. R.
    Gerhards, R.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2008, : 143 - 148
  • [2] Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site-specific yield response
    Bullock, DS
    Lowenberg-DeBoer, J
    Swinton, SM
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 27 (03) : 233 - 245
  • [3] Comparison of simulated crop yield patterns for site-specific management
    VanUffelen, CGR
    Verhagen, J
    Bouma, J
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 54 (02) : 207 - 222
  • [4] Field methods for making productivity classes for site-specific management of wheat
    Lopez de Sabando, Marcelo Jose
    Diaz-Zorita, Martin
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2022, 23 (04) : 1153 - 1173
  • [5] Field methods for making productivity classes for site-specific management of wheat
    Marcelo José López de Sabando
    Martín Diaz-Zorita
    Precision Agriculture, 2022, 23 : 1153 - 1173
  • [6] Site-specific management - Screening yield monitor data improves grain yield maps
    Simbahan, GC
    Dobermann, A
    Ping, JL
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (04) : 1091 - 1102
  • [7] Clustering of grape yield maps to delineate site-specific management zones
    Arno, J.
    Martinez-Casasnovas, J. A.
    Ribes-Dasi, M.
    Rosell, J. R.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (03) : 721 - 729
  • [8] Site-Specific Nutrient Management
    Grzebisz, Witold
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [9] Spatial statistical analysis of on-site crop yield and soil observations for site-specific management
    Wendroth, O
    Jürschik, P
    Giebel, A
    Nielsen, DR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRECISION AGRICULTURE, PTS A AND B, 1999, : 159 - 170
  • [10] Effect of site-specific weed management in winter crops on yield and weed populations
    Hamouz, P.
    Hamouzova, K.
    Tyser, L.
    Holec, J.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 60 (01) : 27 - 35