Socrative as a Formative Assessment Tool in English for Specific Purposes Course

被引:0
|
作者
Kolisnyk, Maryna [1 ]
Kornytska, Yuliya [1 ]
Ogurtsova, Olga [1 ]
Sokyrska, Olga [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Ukraine, Dept English Language Humanities, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytech Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Natl Tech Univ Ukraine, Dept Tech English 2, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytech Inst, Kiev, Ukraine
关键词
distant learning; English for specific purposes; formative assessment; internet service; Socrative; student attitude; Ukraine context;
D O I
10.24093/awej/covid2.25
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Many factors influence the development of the educational system, and today it is a global COVID-19 pandemic. Stakeholders in the educational process need to adjust to a new distant reality without compromising the quality. The formative assessment proved to be a suitable approach to overcome existing challenges, and one of the most popular tools to facilitate it is Socrative. The study aims to 1) investigate student attitudes and the correlation between academic achievements in ESP and majors and 2) present our experience in utilizing Socrative for formative assessment in a distant mode in the settings of the National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute." To achieve the goals of our study, we have developed and validated a questionnaire, collected quantitative data, analyzed and interpreted the qualitative data; the study sample included 137 students. The obtained results have shown the general positive student attitude towards the usage of Socrative within the course of ESP due to its efficacy, personalization, and responsiveness. The results can be a perspective for further investigation despite some limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 392
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] eAssessment in English for Specific Purposes
    Polic, Tamara
    Tomljanovic, Jasminka
    Anic, Nikola
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGIES AND COMPUTERS (ICETC), 2014, : 18 - 23
  • [42] Introducing English for Specific Purposes
    Li, Qiong
    Du, Jianying
    SYSTEM, 2019, 82 : 176 - 177
  • [43] e-Rubrics: A formative as well as summative assessment tool for assessment of course and program outcomes
    Ahankari, Sandeep S.
    Jadhav, Abhijitkumar A.
    2016 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION (T4E 2016), 2016, : 246 - 247
  • [44] VIRTUAL REALITY AS A NEW TOOL IN TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES TO ECOLOGY STUDENTS
    Pavlova, E.
    Ulanova, K.
    Valeeva, N.
    Zakirova, Yu.
    14TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2020), 2020, : 5715 - 5720
  • [45] Asian research on English for specific purposes: Proceedings of the first symposium on Asia English for specific purposes
    Xiao, Yuehai
    Zhao, Angel
    Rao, Jie
    SYSTEM, 2021, 103
  • [46] Formative assessment, self-regulation, feedback and digital tools: use of Socrative in higher education
    Fraile, Juan
    Ruiz-Bravo, Patricia
    Zamorano-Sande, David
    Orgaz-Rincon, Daniel
    RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2021, (42): : 724 - 734
  • [47] Revamping an English for specific academic purposes course for problem-based learning: Reflections from course developers
    Yung, Kevin Wai-Ho
    Fong, Natalie
    JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2024, 69
  • [48] Researching Classroom-Based Assessment for Formative Purposes
    Gu, Peter Yongqi
    Yu, Guoxing
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2020, 43 (02) : 150 - 168
  • [49] Science teachers' interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes
    Staberg, Ragnhild Lyngved
    Febri, Maria Immaculata Maya
    Gjovik, Oistein
    Sikko, Svein Arne
    Pepin, Birgit
    EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2023, 35 (01) : 5 - 35
  • [50] Science teachers’ interactions with resources for formative assessment purposes
    Ragnhild Lyngved Staberg
    Maria Immaculata Maya Febri
    Øistein Gjøvik
    Svein Arne Sikko
    Birgit Pepin
    Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2023, 35 : 5 - 35