On Addressing Mobility Issues in Wireless Mesh Networks using Software-Defined Networking

被引:0
|
作者
Labraoui, Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Chatzinakis, Charalampos [1 ]
Boc, Michael Mathias [1 ]
Fladenmuller, Anne [2 ]
机构
[1] CEA, Communicating Syst Lab, LIST, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[2] Univ Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Lab Informat Paris CNRS 6 LIP6, 4 Pl Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
来源
2016 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS AND FUTURE NETWORKS (ICUFN) | 2016年
关键词
Wireless mesh networks; Software-Defined Network; routing protocols; network performances; ROUTING PROTOCOLS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Wireless Mesh Networks (WMNs) are ad-hoc networks where no infrastructure exists and where some of the participating nodes can also act as routers to forward traffic on behalf of others. WMNs have been proposed for various applications and can greatly vary in terms of size (from a handful of nodes to thousands) and complexity (static or mobile nodes, scarce or dense etc.). Efficient and robust IP routing is essential for these networks and its performance can greatly affect all other network performance metrics such as throughput, delay, packet delivery ratio etc. A lot of routing algorithms have been proposed ever since the advent of WMNs and research is still ongoing on the topic. All of the proposed solutions are based on the principle of distributed routing where routers exchange signalization messages in order to discover the network topology. In the present paper we propose a centralized routing based on the relatively recent paradigm of Software Defined Networking (SDN). We have used NS3 to simulate a dynamic mesh network where a subset of nodes are mobile and a source host generates traffic destined to a sink host. We evaluated four common network performance metrics namely packet delivery ratio, packet drop ratio due to route unavailability, average throughput and signalling overhead. By making appropriate assumptions, we compared our solution with three of the most widely used routing protocols for WMNs namely DSDV, AODV and OLSR. Our simulations demonstrate that, under certain conditions, our solution outperforms the aforementioned distributed routing algorithms and can improve network performance.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 908
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Survey: Typical Security Issues of Software-Defined Networking
    Liu, Yifan
    Zhao, Bo
    Zhao, Pengyuan
    Fan, Peiru
    Liu, Hui
    CHINA COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 16 (07) : 13 - 31
  • [32] Programming Software-Defined Wireless Networks
    Riggio, Roberto
    Rasheed, Tinku
    Marina, Mahesh K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE COMPUTING AND NETWORKING (MOBICOM '14), 2014, : 413 - 415
  • [33] Software-Defined Networking
    Kirkpatrick, Keith
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2013, 56 (09) : 16 - 19
  • [34] Software-defined networking
    Greene, Kate
    Technology Review, 2009, 112 (02)
  • [35] Programming Software-Defined Wireless Networks
    Riggio, Roberto
    Gomez, Karina Mabell
    Rasheed, Tinku
    Schulz-Zander, Julius
    Kuklinski, Slawomir
    Marina, Mahesh K.
    2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (CNSM), 2014, : 118 - 126
  • [36] A Survey: Typical Security Issues of Software-Defined Networking
    Yifan Liu
    Bo Zhao
    Pengyuan Zhao
    Peiru Fan
    Hui Liu
    中国通信, 2019, 16 (07) : 13 - 31
  • [37] Software-Defined Carrier Wireless Networks
    Li, Xu
    Djukic, Petar
    Stojmenovic, Ivan
    Luo, Zhi-Quan
    IEEE NETWORK, 2015, 29 (04): : 4 - 5
  • [38] Software-Defined Networking
    Zhili Sun
    Jiandong Li
    Kun Yang
    ZTECommunications, 2014, 12 (02) : 1 - 2
  • [39] Software-Defined Wireless Networking: Centralized, Distributed, or Hybrid?
    Abolhasan, Mehran
    Lipman, Justin
    Ni, Wei
    Hagelstein, Brett
    IEEE NETWORK, 2015, 29 (04): : 32 - 38
  • [40] WNOS: Enabling Principled Software-Defined Wireless Networking
    Guan, Zhangyu
    Bertizzolo, Lorenzo
    Demirors, Emrecan
    Melodia, Tommaso
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2021, 29 (03) : 1391 - 1407