A continuous selection for optimal portfolios under convex risk measures does not always exist

被引:1
|
作者
Baes, Michel [1 ]
Munari, Cosimo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Math, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Ctr Finance & Insurance, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich, Swiss Finance Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Risk measures; Portfolio selection; Perturbation analysis; Continuous selections;
D O I
10.1007/s00186-019-00681-x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Risk control is one of the crucial problems in finance. One of the most common ways to mitigate risk of an investor's financial position is to set up a portfolio of hedging securities whose aim is to absorb unexpected losses and thus provide the investor with an acceptable level of security. In this respect, it is clear that investors will try to reach acceptability at the lowest possible cost. Mathematically, this problem leads naturally to considering set-valued maps that associate to each financial position the corresponding set of optimal hedging portfolios, i.e., of portfolios that ensure acceptability at the cheapest cost. Among other properties of such maps, the ability to ensure lower semicontinuity and continuous selections is key from an operational perspective. It is known that lower semicontinuity generally fails in an infinite-dimensional setting. In this note, we show that neither lower semicontinuity nor, more surprisingly, the existence of continuous selections can be a priori guaranteed even in a finite-dimensional setting. In particular, this failure is possible under arbitrage-free markets and convex risk measures.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 23
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Portfolio selection based on graphs: Does it align with Markowitz-optimal portfolios?
    Huettner, Amelie
    Mai, Jan-Frederik
    Mineo, Stefano
    DEPENDENCE MODELING, 2018, 6 (01): : 63 - 87
  • [22] Robustness of optimal portfolios under risk and stochastic dominance constraints
    Dupacova, Jitka
    Kopa, Milos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 234 (02) : 434 - 441
  • [23] Beyond expected utility: Subjective risk aversion and optimal portfolio choice under convex shortfall risk measures
    Brandtner, Mario
    Kuersten, Wolfgang
    Rischau, Robert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 285 (03) : 1114 - 1126
  • [24] Risk Analysis in the Selection of Renewable Energy Portfolios under Uncertainty
    Grandhi, Srimannarayana
    Wibowo, Santoso
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 14TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2019), 2019, : 619 - 624
  • [25] RISK-RETURN APPROACH TO SELECTION OF OPTIMAL GOVERNMENT BOND PORTFOLIOS
    YAWITZ, JB
    HEMPEL, GH
    MARSHALL, WJ
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1976, 5 (03) : 36 - 45
  • [26] Risk measures and optimal portfolio selection.
    Dhaene, J
    Vanduffel, S
    Tang, QH
    Goovaerts, MJ
    Kaas, R
    Vyncke, D
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2003, 33 (02): : 425 - 425
  • [27] Optimal portfolios with lower partial moment constraints and lpm-risk-optimal martingale measures
    Leitner, Johannes
    MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2008, 18 (02) : 317 - 331
  • [28] Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios
    Padgett, Jamie E.
    Nielson, Bryant G.
    DesRoches, Reginald
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2008, 37 (05): : 711 - 725
  • [29] A Framework for Dynamic Hedging under Convex Risk Measures
    Toussaint, Antoine
    Sircar, Ronnie
    SEMINAR ON STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS, RANDOM FIELDS AND APPLICATIONS VI, 2011, 63 : 429 - +
  • [30] BANK ACTIVITIES AND THEIR RISK. DOES AN OPTIMAL MODEL EXIST IN BANKING?
    Hryekiewicz-Gontarczyk, Aneta
    ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA, 2016, 36 (01): : 125 - 164