Multifractal analysis of soil surface roughness

被引:40
|
作者
Moreno, R. Garcia [1 ]
Alvarez, M. C. Diaz [1 ]
Requejo, A. Saa [1 ]
Tarquis, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Agr Engn, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.2136/vzj2007.0016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil surface roughness (SSR) is a parameter highly suited to the study of soil susceptibility to wind and water erosion. The development of a methodology for quantifying SSR is therefore instrumental to soil evaluation. We developed such a method, based on the multifractal analysis (MFA) of soil elevation measurements collected at the intersections on a 2- by 2-cm(2) grid in a 200- by 200-cm(2) plot. Samples were defined using the gliding box algorithm (GB), in which a box of a given size "glides" across the grid map in all possible directions. The advantage of the GB over the box counting algorithm is that it yields a greater number of large sample sizes, which usually leads to better statistical results. Standard deviation, semivariogram fractal dimension, and semivariogram crossover length were estimated for all scenarios to compare the results of SSR multifractal analysis to indices found with traditional techniques. For its high sensitivity to the spatial arrangement implicit in a data set, MFA appears to be better suited than classical indices to compare plots tilled under different management criteria. The results showed that MFA is able to effectively reflect the heterogeneity and complexity of agricultural SSR. Based on this type of analysis, two new indices have been defined to compare the multifractal spectrum characteristics of the raw data to the characteristics of a random field with the same average and SD.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 520
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] "FLASHING FIELDS" AND THE IMPACT OF SOIL SURFACE ROUGHNESS
    Marzahn, P.
    Wegmuller, U.
    Mattia, F.
    Ludwig, R.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 6963 - 6966
  • [22] Study on the Measurement Method of Soil Surface Roughness
    Zheng Zicheng
    He Shuqin
    MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-8, 2012, 383-390 : 5357 - +
  • [23] Comparative of Measurement Methods Of Soil Surface Roughness
    Altikat, S.
    Celik, A.
    JOURNAL OF TEKIRDAG AGRICULTURE FACULTY-TEKIRDAG ZIRAAT FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2013, 10 (02): : 104 - 109
  • [24] Wind erosion of soil in relation to roughness of surface
    Chepil, WS
    Milne, RA
    SOIL SCIENCE, 1941, 52 (01) : 417 - 433
  • [25] Condition for precise measurement of soil surface roughness
    Oh, Y
    Kay, YC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1998, 36 (02): : 691 - 695
  • [26] Soil surface roughness indices, interpretation and application
    Zhang H.
    Sun Y.
    Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2010, 41 (03): : 33 - 39
  • [27] Soil surface roughness measurement - methods, applicability, and surface representation
    Jester, W
    Klik, A
    CATENA, 2005, 64 (2-3) : 174 - 192
  • [28] Rainfall and surface roughness effects on soil loss and surface runoff
    Jester, W
    Klik, A
    Hauer, G
    Hebel, B
    Truman, CC
    SOIL EROSION RESEARCH FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 463 - 466
  • [29] Effect of soil surface roughness and scene components on soil surface bidrectional reflectance factor
    Wang, Z.
    Coburn, C. A.
    Ren, X.
    Teillet, P. M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 92 (02) : 297 - 313
  • [30] Biocrust and the soil surface: Influence of climate, disturbance, and biocrust recovery on soil surface roughness
    Caster, Joshua
    Sankey, Temuulen Ts
    Sankey, Joel B.
    Bowker, Matthew A.
    Buscombe, Daniel
    Duniway, Michael C.
    Barger, Nichole
    Faist, Akasha
    Joyal, Taylor
    GEODERMA, 2021, 403