Appia vs. Cactus:: Comparing protocol composition frameworks

被引:3
|
作者
Mena, S [1 ]
Cuvellier, X [1 ]
Grégoire, C [1 ]
Schiper, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1109/RELDIS.2003.1238068
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The paper presents and compares Appia and Cactus, two frameworks for protocol composition. The comparison is based on the experience gained in implementing a fault tolerant Atomic Broadcast service. The paper also gives preliminary performance results, and concludes with a discussion of the most interesting features of the two frameworks, and suggestions for an improved framework.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 198
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Influence Of Training Protocol On Endurance Effects: Regular Training Vs. Weekend Warrior Vs. Fat Burner
    Meyer, Tim
    Auracher, Markus
    Urhausen, Axel J. P.
    Kindermann, Wilfried
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2005, 37 : S51 - S51
  • [42] Network meta-analysis comparing iFR vs. FFR vs. coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization
    Verardi, R.
    Fioravanti, F.
    D'Ascenzo, F.
    Barbero, U.
    Conrotto, F.
    Montefusco, A.
    Omede, P.
    Moretti, C.
    D'Amico, M.
    Escaned, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 954 - 954
  • [43] Commercial vs. aerospace worlds: Comparing software engineering cultures
    Dorfman, M
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 1999, 16 (06) : 97 - 100
  • [44] Food production vs. biodiversity: comparing organic and conventional agriculture
    Gabriel, Doreen
    Sait, Steven M.
    Kunin, William E.
    Benton, Tim G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2013, 50 (02) : 355 - 364
  • [45] Experiments Comparing the Efficacy of HALT vs. Traditional Stress Testing
    Aoki, Yuichi
    Doertenbach, Neill
    Hirata, Takuya
    Pihet, Raphael
    2019 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2019) - R & M IN THE SECOND MACHINE AGE - THE CHALLENGE OF CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [46] Comparing parallelization of an ACO:: Message passing vs. shared memory
    Delisle, P
    Gravel, M
    Krajecki, M
    Gagné, C
    Price, WL
    HYBRID METAHEURISTICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3636 : 1 - 11
  • [47] Comparing random dot motion in MATLAB vs. Inquisit Millisecond
    Yaghoubi, Kimia C. C.
    Kabbara, Sarah
    Arian, Sara
    Kobaissi, Hadi
    Peters, Megan A. K.
    Seitz, Aaron R. R.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [48] Comparing Subject Recruitment Strategies: Clinic vs. Letter Approaches
    Tutino, Rebecca Carol
    Buda, Kara
    Gelfarb, Lauren
    Straus, Emma
    Osborn, Alice
    Saracino, Rebecca
    Caraline, Demirjian
    Stephanie, Napolitano
    Nelson, Christian
    Duhamel, Katherine
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 136 - 137
  • [49] Comparing FPGA vs. Custom CMOS and the Impact on Processor Microarchitecture
    Wong, Henry
    Betz, Vaughn
    Rose, Jonathan
    FPGA 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 ACM/SIGDA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAYS, 2011, : 5 - 14
  • [50] Comparing nucleophilic substitution vs. elimination in organic chemistry textbooks
    Nelson, Donna J.
    Kumar, Ravi
    Merugude, Shesharao
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 247