A model for change: An approach for forecasting well-being from service-based decisions

被引:11
|
作者
Summers, J. Kevin [1 ]
Harwell, Linda C. [1 ]
Smith, Liaa M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hlth & Environm Effect Res Lab, Gulf Ecol Div, 1 Sabine Isl Dr, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA
关键词
Human Well-Being Index; Forecasting; Relationship functions; Affective forecasting; Community decision-making; BIAS; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.033
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Every community decision incorporates a "forecasting" strategy (whether formal or implicit) to help visualize expected results and evaluate the potential "feelings/responses" that people living in that community may have about those results. With more communities seeking to make decisions based on sustainable alternatives, forecasting efforts that examine potential impacts of decisions on overall community well-being may prove to be valuable for not only gauging future benefits and trade-offs, but also for recognizing a community's affective response to the outcomes of those decisions. This paper describes a forecasting approach based on concepts introduced in the development of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) Human Well-Being Index (HWBI) (Smith et al., 2014; Summers et al., 2014). The approach examines the relationships among selected economic, environmental and social services that can be directly impacted by community decisions and eight domains of human well-being. Using models developed from constructed- or fixed-effect step-wise and multiple regressions and 11 years of data (2000-2010), these relationship functions may be used to characterize likely direct impacts of decisions on future well-being, as well as the possible intended and unintended secondary and tertiary effects relative to any main decision effects. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 309
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Theories of well-being and well-being policy: a view from methodology
    Fumagalli, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC METHODOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 124 - 133
  • [32] From general well-being to school well-being: a systematic review
    Losada-Puente, Luisa
    Mendiri, Paula
    Rebollo-Quintela, Nuria
    RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2022, 28 (01):
  • [33] A Model for System-Level Change to Improve Workforce Well-Being
    Safeer, Richard
    Lucik, Meg
    Davila, Tara B.
    Kalia, Nimisha
    NEJM CATALYST INNOVATIONS IN CARE DELIVERY, 2025, 6 (01):
  • [34] IT Service Well-being, in the Higher Education Ecosystem
    Maryam Heidari
    Geraldine Torrisi-Steele
    Sebastian Binnewies
    SN Computer Science, 5 (7)
  • [35] Measurement Validity of the Six-Factor Model of Psychological Well-Being in a Military Sample: Implications for Measuring Well-Being in Service Members
    Trachik, Benjamin
    Fawver, Bradley
    Trapp, Stephen K.
    Goldberg, Simon B.
    Ganulin, Michelle L.
    Kearns, Nathan T.
    McKeon, Ashlee B.
    Dretsch, Michael N.
    Sowden, Walter J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 35 (09) : 729 - 739
  • [36] The impact of military service on health and well-being
    Williamson, V.
    Diehle, J.
    Dunn, R.
    Jones, N.
    Greenberg, N.
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2019, 69 (01): : 64 - 70
  • [37] Public service motivation, workplace spirituality and employee well-being: a holistic approach
    Hassan, Sobia
    Ansari, Nighat
    Rehman, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2023, 39 (04) : 1027 - 1043
  • [38] Transformative service research: focus on well-being
    Rosenbaum, Mark S.
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2015, 35 (7-8): : 363 - 367
  • [39] QUALITY OF LIFE PARADOX. WELL-BEING RANKING OF THE SELECTED EUROPEAN COUNTRIES BASED ON HYBRID WELL-BEING APPROACH
    Kwarcinski, Tomasz
    Ulman, Pawel
    ECONOMICS & SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 13 (02) : 160 - 180
  • [40] SOCIAL WELL-BEING - CONFLICT APPROACH
    FREEMAN, DM
    TREMAINE, JA
    MADSON, P
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1977, 5 (04) : 319 - 333