Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico reduce forest fragmentation

被引:27
|
作者
Ramirez-Reyes, Carlos [1 ]
Sims, Katharine R. E. [2 ,3 ]
Potapov, Peter [4 ]
Radeloff, Volker C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest & Wildlife Ecol, SILVIS Lab, 1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Amherst Coll, Dept Econ, POB 5000, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[3] Amherst Coll, Dept Environm Studies, POB 5000, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
deforestation; forest loss; habitat loss; image morphology; land use change; Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis program; protected areas; MORPHOLOGICAL SPATIAL-PATTERN; LAND-COVER CHANGE; PROTECTED AREAS; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HYDROLOGICAL SERVICES; AGRICULTURAL TRADE; TROPICAL FORESTS; LATIN-AMERICA; CONSERVATION; DEFORESTATION;
D O I
10.1002/eap.1753
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Forest fragmentation can lead to habitat reduction, edge increase, and exposure to disturbances. A key emerging policy to protect forests is payments for ecosystem services (PES), which offers compensation to landowners for environmental stewardship. Mexico was one of the first countries to implement a broad-scale PES program, enrolling over 2.3 Mha by 2010. However, Mexico's PES did not completely eliminate deforestation in enrolled parcels and could have increased incentives to hide deforestation in ways that increased fragmentation. We studied whether Mexican forests enrolled in the PES program had less forest fragmentation than those not enrolled, and whether the PES effects varied among forest types, among socioeconomic zones, or compared to the protected areas system. We analyzed forest cover maps from 2000 to 2012 to calculate forest fragmentation. We summarized fragmentation for different forest types and in four socioeconomic zones. We then used matching analysis to investigate the possible causal impacts of the PES on forests across Mexico and compared the effects of the PES program with that of protected areas. We found that the area covered by forest in Mexico decreased by 3.4% from 2000 to 2012, but there was 9.3% less forest core area. Change in forest cover was highest in the southern part of Mexico, and high-stature evergreen tropical forest lost the most core areas (-17%), while oak forest lost the least (-2%). Our matching analysis found that the PES program reduced both forest cover loss and forest fragmentation. Low-PES areas increased twice as much of the number of forest patches, forest edge, forest islets, and largest area of forest lost compared to high-PES areas. Compared to the protected areas system in Mexico, high-PES areas performed similarly in preventing fragmentation, but not as well as biosphere reserve core zones. We conclude that the PES was successful in slowing forest fragmentation at the regional and country level. However, the program could be improved by targeting areas where forest changes are more frequent, especially in southern Mexico. Fragmentation analyses should be implemented in other areas to monitor the outcomes of protection programs such as REDD+ and PES.
引用
收藏
页码:1982 / 1997
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of forest management on some ecosystem services in temperate forest ecosystems of Mexico
    Carlos Monarrez-Gonzalez, Jose
    Perez-Verdin, Gustavo
    Lopez-Gonzalez, Celia
    Antonio Marquez-Linares, Marco
    del Socorro Gonzalez-Elizondo, Maria
    MADERA Y BOSQUES, 2018, 24 (02):
  • [22] Assessing the effects of payments for ecosystem services programs on forest structure and species biodiversity
    Chen, Hsiang Ling
    Lewison, Rebecca L.
    An, Li
    Tsai, Yu Hsin
    Stow, Douglas
    Shi, Lei
    Yang, Shuang
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 29 (07) : 2123 - 2140
  • [23] Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review
    Yan, Haiming
    Yang, Huicai
    Guo, Xiaonan
    Zhao, Shuqin
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [24] Does forest loss and fragmentation reduce woodpecker-associated ecosystem functions?
    Yasuda, Kazuma
    Kato, Daiki
    Naoe, Shoji
    Amano, Tatsuya
    Yoshikawa, Tetsuro
    Tochigi, Kahoko
    Koike, Shinsuke
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2025, 57
  • [25] Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Two decades of progress and challenges between research and practice
    Izquierdo-Tort, Santiago
    Alatorre, Andrea
    Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth
    Corbera, Esteve
    Deschamps-Lomeli, Jimena
    Avila-Foucat, Veronique Sophie
    Carabias, Julia
    Dupras, Jerome
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Nunez, Juan Manuel
    Perevochtchikova, Maria
    Sims, Katharine
    Van Hecken, Gert
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 73
  • [26] Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico's carbon forestry programme
    Corbera, Esteve
    Soberanis, Carmen Gonzalez
    Brown, Katrina
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) : 743 - 761
  • [27] Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico
    Balderas Torres, Arturo
    MacMillan, Douglas C.
    Skutsch, Margaret
    Lovett, Jon C.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 6 : 72 - 81
  • [28] Payments for Ecosystem Services—the Case of Forests
    Irina Prokofieva
    Current Forestry Reports, 2016, 2 : 130 - 142
  • [29] The promise and perils of payments for ecosystem services
    Salzman, Jim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 1 (1-2) : 5 - 20
  • [30] A zoological perspective on payments for ecosystem services
    McNeely, Jeffrey A.
    INTEGRATIVE ZOOLOGY, 2007, 2 (02): : 68 - 78