Principles of Indicators Formation for Quality of Communication Networks Monitoring

被引:0
|
作者
Babkin, V. A. [1 ]
Stroganova, E. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mobile Telesyst PJSC, Moscow, Russia
[2] Moscow Tech Univ Commun & Informat, Moscow, Russia
关键词
quality criteria; monitoring; communication network; measurement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Currently, communication networks provide a fairly large number of services to the end user. At the same time, each service has its own set of performance indicators for the network infrastructure, which determine the quality of the provision of this particular service. It should be noted that the quality of the provision of different communication services can be influenced by both different and the same quality indicators of the network infrastructure. At the same time, the common for some services indicators of the quality of the network infrastructure may have for each service different permissible ranges of values and be related or depend on the values of other indicators of the quality of the network infrastructure. Such complex relationships between the quality of network services and the quality indicators of the network infrastructure make individual monitoring of the values of the quality indicators of the network infrastructure not always advisable, because such monitoring algorithms have a high degree of branching due to a large number of conditions. In this case, it is most expedient to form for each service from the quality indicators of the network infrastructure some evaluation function, the output of which values beyond the allowable range will indicate degradation of the quality of a particular service and define a set of quality indicators for the network infrastructure for their further detailed control.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AIR QUALITY MONITORING NETWORKS
    KEITZ, EL
    MONGAN, TR
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1970, 51 (10) : 1000 - &
  • [22] Quality of Monitoring for Cellular Networks
    Motlagh, Naser Hossein
    Kapoor, Shubham
    Alhalaseh, Rola
    Tarkoma, Sasu
    Hatonen, Kimmo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 19 (01): : 381 - 391
  • [24] Integral Quality Indicators of Modern Communication Network Functioning
    Babkin, V. A.
    Stroganova, E. P.
    [J]. 2020 SYSTEMS OF SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION, GENERATING AND PROCESSING IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS (SYNCHROINFO), 2020,
  • [25] System formation algorithm of communication network quality factors using artificial neural networks
    Paraschuk, IB
    [J]. 1ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS FOR COMMNICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 263 - 266
  • [26] CRITERIA AND QUALITY INDICATORS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES OF LEARNING
    Spirin, Oleg M.
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND LEARNING TOOLS, 2013, 33 (01)
  • [27] The quality indicators of communication and professional integration in health services
    Mola, E.
    Vantaggiato, L.
    Maggio, A.
    Aquilino, A.
    Musilli, A.
    Panfilo, M.
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (33-34) : 197S - 198S
  • [28] Definition of Key Performance Indicators for Noise Monitoring Networks
    Bolognese, Matteo
    Carpita, Stefano
    Fredianelli, Luca
    Licitra, Gaetano
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 10 (04)
  • [29] Quality Dashboard-A Great Tool for Monitoring Key Quality Indicators
    Wartick, M.
    Waldman, K.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2009, 49 : 236A - 236A
  • [30] Polymer networks: principles of formation, structure and properties
    Stepto, RFT
    Cail, JI
    Taylor, DJR
    [J]. POLIMERY, 2000, 45 (7-8) : 455 - 464