Synergistic Measurements of Hurricane Wind Speeds and Directions from C-band Dual-Polarization Synthetic Aperture Radar

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Biao [1 ]
Fan, Shengren [1 ]
Mouche, Alexis [2 ]
Zhang, Guosheng [1 ]
Perrie, William [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] IFREMER, Lab Oceanog Phys Spatiale, Plouzane, France
[3] Bedford Inst Oceanog, Dartmouth, NS, Canada
关键词
Synthetic Aperture Radar; Hurricane; Wind; Dual-polarization;
D O I
10.1109/igarss.2019.8898747
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Co- and cross-polarized geophysical model function (GMFs) both have limitations to retrieve ocean surface wind speeds. The former underestimates high winds and the latter overstimates low winds. In this study, we both use Co- and cross-polarized SAR observations to retrieve hurricane wind speeds and directions. The local gradient method is first used to estimate hurricane wind directions from C-band RADARSAT-2 and Sentinel-1A dual-polarization SAR imagery. We compare wind directions derived from 10 dual-polarization SAR images with collocated wind directions from buoys, GPS dropsondes, scatterometer, radiometer, and Hurricane Research Division Real-time Hurricane Wind Analysis System (H*Wind) data. Statistical comparisons show that the wind direction bias and root-mean-square error are 3.22 degrees and 21.53 degrees, respectively. Subsequently, as a case study for Hurricane Maria, the retrieved wind directions, along with Co- and cross-polarized GMFs are used to derive wind speeds. The retrieved wind speeds are validated with collocated Stepped-Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) measurements. The results show that the combination of Co- and cross-polarized GMFs has capability of obtaining more reasonable hurricane wind speeds and directions than by only using co-or cross-pol GMF.
引用
收藏
页码:4618 / 4621
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dual-polarization measurements at C-band over the ocean:: Results from airborne radar observations and comparison with ENVISAT ASAR data
    Mouche, AA
    Hauser, D
    Daloze, JF
    Guérin, C
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 43 (04): : 753 - 769
  • [22] Operational C-Band Dual-Polarization Radar QPE for the Subtropical Complex Terrain of Taiwan
    Wang, Yadong
    Zhang, Jian
    Chang, Pao-Liang
    Langston, Carrie
    Kaney, Brian
    Tang, Lin
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2016, 2016
  • [23] C-band Dual-Polarization Radar Observations of a Massive Volcanic Eruption in South America
    Vidal, Luciano
    Nesbitt, Stephen W.
    Salio, Paola
    Farias, Camila
    Gabriela Nicora, Maria
    Soledad Osores, Maria
    Mereu, Luigi
    Marzano, Frank S.
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (03) : 960 - 974
  • [24] A C-band inverse synthetic aperture radar system
    Lin, PP
    Lu, GC
    Huan, H
    ICR '96 - 1996 CIE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF RADAR, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 250 - 253
  • [26] Calibration Accuracy of the Dual-Polarization Receivers of the C-Band Swiss Weather Radar Network
    Gabella, Marco
    Boscacci, Marco
    Sartori, Maurizio
    Germann, Urs
    ATMOSPHERE, 2016, 7 (06):
  • [27] Microphysical retrievals from dual-polarization radar measurements at X band
    Gorgucci, Eugenio
    Chandrasekar, V.
    Baldini, Luca
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 25 (05) : 729 - 741
  • [28] C-band dual-polarization SAR images sea surface wind speed inversion
    Wei, Qisong
    Cheng, Yi
    2024 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOLOGY, MAPPING AND REMOTE SENSING, ICGMRS 2024, 2024, : 212 - 215
  • [29] Drop size distribution retrieval using dual-polarization radar at C-band and S-band
    Durbin, Daniel
    Wang, Yadong
    Chang, Pao-Liang
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (17) : 5397 - 5411
  • [30] Numerical simulation of raindrop scattering for C-band dual-polarization Doppler weather radar parameters
    Teng, Shiwen
    Hu, Hanfeng
    Liu, Chao
    Hu, Fangchao
    Wang, Zhenhui
    Yin, Yan
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2018, 213 : 133 - 142