A randomized-controlled trial of community-based transdiagnostic psychotherapy for veterans and internally displaced persons in Ukraine

被引:14
|
作者
Bogdanov, Sergiy [1 ]
Augustinavicius, Jura [2 ]
Bass, Judith K. [2 ]
Metz, Kristie [2 ]
Skavenski, Stephanie [2 ]
Singh, Namrita S. [3 ]
Moore, Quincy [2 ]
Haroz, Emily E.
Kane, Jeremy [4 ]
Doty, Ben [2 ]
Murray, Laura [2 ]
Bolton, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Kyiv Mohyla Acad, Ctr Mental Hlth & Psychosocial Support, Kiev, Ukraine
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Mental Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
来源
GLOBAL MENTAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 8卷
关键词
CETA; Brief CETA; community-based; trial; mental health; military conflict; psychotherapy; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; ALCOHOL-USE; MECHANISMS; DISORDERS; SEARCH; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1017/gmh.2021.27
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background There is limited research on community-based mental health interventions in former Soviet countries despite different contextual factors from where most research has been conducted. Ongoing military conflict has resulted in many displaced persons and veterans and their families with high burdens of mental health problems. Lack of community-based services and poor uptake of existing psychiatric services led to the current trial to determine the effectiveness of the common elements treatment approach (CETA) on anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTS) among conflict affected adults in Ukraine. Methods We conducted a three-armed randomized-controlled trial of CETA delivered in its standard form (8-12 sessions), a brief form (five-sessions), and a wait-control condition. Eligible participants were displaced adults, army veterans and their adult family members with elevated depression and/or PTS and impaired functioning. Treatment was delivered by community-based providers trained in both standard and brief CETA. Outcome data were collected monthly. Results There were 302 trial participants (n = 117 brief CETA, n = 129 standard CETA, n = 56 wait-controls). Compared with wait-controls, participants in standard and brief CETA experienced clinically and statistically significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and PTS and dysfunction (effect sizes d = 0.46-1.0-6). Comparing those who received standard CETA with brief CETA, the former reported fewer symptoms and less dysfunction with small-to-medium effect sized (d = 0.20-0.55). Conclusions Standard CETA is more effective than brief CETA, but brief CETA also had significant effects compared with wait-controls. Given demonstrated effectiveness, CETA could be scaled up as an effective community-based approach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized Controlled Trial of Community-Based Dancing to Modify Disease Progression in Parkinson Disease
    Duncan, Ryan P.
    Earhart, Gammon M.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2012, 26 (02) : 132 - 143
  • [42] Improving albumin levels among hemodialysis patients: A community-based randomized controlled trial
    Leon, Janeen B.
    Albert, Jeffrey M.
    Gilchrist, Gina
    Kushner, Irving
    Lerner, Edith
    Mach, Suzanne
    Majerle, Angela
    Porter, David
    Ricanati, Edmond
    Sperry, Laurine
    Sullivan, Catherine
    Zimmerer, Jennifer
    Sehgal, Ashwini R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2006, 48 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [43] Community-Based Intervention to Improve Cardiometabolic Targets in Patients With Stroke A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Olaiya, Muideen T.
    Cadilhac, Dominique A.
    Kim, Joosup
    Nelson, Mark R.
    Srikanth, Velandai K.
    Gerraty, Richard P.
    Bladin, Christopher F.
    Fitzgerald, Sharyn M.
    Thanh Phan
    Frayne, Judith
    Thrift, Amanda G.
    STROKE, 2017, 48 (09) : 2504 - +
  • [44] The knitting community-based trial for older women with osteoarthritis of the hands: design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial
    Guitard, Paulette
    Brosseau, Lucie
    Wells, George A.
    Paquet, Nicole
    Paterson, Gail
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Cavallo, Sabrina
    Aydin, Sibel Z.
    Leonard, Guillaume
    De Angelis, Gino
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [45] The knitting community-based trial for older women with osteoarthritis of the hands: design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial
    Paulette Guitard
    Lucie Brosseau
    George A. Wells
    Nicole Paquet
    Gail Paterson
    Karine Toupin-April
    Sabrina Cavallo
    Sibel Z. Aydin
    Guillaume Léonard
    Gino De Angelis
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [46] Integrative Stress Reduction Program for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia: A Randomized-Controlled Trial
    Sanprakhon, Panawat
    Chaimongkol, Nujjaree
    Lach, Helen W.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2023, 45 (11) : 1017 - 1026
  • [47] Acupuncture in persons with an increased stress level-Results from a randomized-controlled pilot trial
    Wild, Beate
    Brenner, Judith
    Joos, Stefanie
    Samstag, Yvonne
    Buckert, Magdalena
    Valentini, Jan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (07):
  • [48] Designing a smoking cessation intervention for the unique needs of homeless persons: a community-based randomized clinical trial
    Goldade, Kate
    Whembolua, Guy-Lucien
    Thomas, Janet
    Eischen, Sara
    Guo, Hongfei
    Connett, John
    Des Jarlais, Don
    Resnicow, Ken
    Gelberg, Lillian
    Owen, Greg
    Grant, Jon
    Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.
    Okuyemi, Kolawole S.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 8 (06) : 744 - 754
  • [49] Community-based alcohol counselling: a randomized clinical trial
    Shakeshaft, AP
    Bowman, JA
    Burrows, S
    Doran, HM
    Sanson-Fisher, RW
    ADDICTION, 2002, 97 (11) : 1449 - 1463
  • [50] Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Feedback to Community-Based Therapists Based on Patient Reports of Trust and Respect
    Connolly Gibbons, Mary Beth
    Duong, Lang
    Zoupou, Eirini
    Kashden, Jody
    Fisher, Jena
    Crits-Christoph, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 91 (06) : 337 - 349