The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: Can we implement it in Saudi Arabia?

被引:11
|
作者
Alfayez, Saud Mohammed [1 ]
Bin Dous, Abdullah Nasser [1 ]
Altowim, Abdullah Abdulaziz [2 ]
Alrabiei, Qais Abdulmohsin [3 ]
Alsubaie, Bandar Obaid [1 ]
Awwad, Waleed Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, King Saud Univ Med City, Orthoped Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Secur Forces Hosp, Orthoped Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
DISC DEGENERATION; AGE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2017.04.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Japanese Orthopedic Association designed their back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) which was proven to be feasible, reliable and valid. The questionnaire's validity and reliability were confirmed when it was implemented in patients with different cultural background. Since the JOABPEQ still has not been utilized in any of the Arabic countries, we present the Arabic version with its validity and reliability. Methods: After ensuring an optimal forwarde-backward translation of the JOABPEQ, the Arabic version was distributed among 151 patients visiting our clinics from December 2015 to February 2016. The reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha. The convergent validity was assessed through aggregating and correlating the questionnaire's items with their previously designed and validated subscales described in the JOABPEQ validity study by Fukui et al. (four items for social function, seven for mental health, six for lumbar function, five for walking ability and four for low back pain); Spearman's correlation matrix was used. The correlation coefficient had to be greater than 0.40 for each item with its corresponding subscale to be satisfactory. Scores underwent descriptive analysis, and Manne-Whitney u test was performed to compare between categorical subgroups. Results: 151 spine patients completed the questionnaire. The mean age (range) was 34.9 (10-72) years. The male respondents were 61 (40.4%) and the females were 90 (59.6%). The result of Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency (reliability) was 0.87 for the 25 items. The validity was confirmed since the correlation coefficient was greater than 0.4 for each item with only its relevant subscale. Conclusion: the Arabic version of the JOABPEQ is valid, reliable and feasible in assessing patients with spine disorders. We believe the JOABPEQ with its different versions are suitable questionnaires to be used across nations and can serve as a unified tool in conducting research and exchanging information in the future. (C) 2017 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 621
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version
    Poosiripinyo, Thanate
    Paholpak, Permsak
    Jirarattanaphochai, Kitti
    Kosuwon, Weerachai
    Sirichativapee, Winai
    Wisanuyotin, Taweechok
    Laupattarakasem, Pat
    Sukhonthamarn, Kamolsak
    Jeeravipoolvarn, Polasak
    Sakakibara, Toshihiko
    Kasai, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [2] Teleworking Survey in Saudi Arabia: Reliability and Validity of Arabic Version of the Questionnaire
    Alnujaidi, Heba Yaagoub
    Hussain, Mehwish
    Almubarak, Sama'a H.
    Alfayez, Asma Saud
    Alsalman, Demah Mansour
    Alsaif, Atheer Khalid
    Al-Juwair, Mona M.
    JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 55 (06): : 578 - 585
  • [3] Structural validity of the Japanese Orthopedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire in individuals with chronic low back pain
    Pinheiro, Jocassia Silva
    Pontes-Silva, Andre
    Costa Araujo, Gabriel Gardhel
    Mendes, Leticia Padilha
    Pires, Flavio de Oliveira
    Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes, Cid Andre
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (08): : 1087 - 1092
  • [4] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Kanik, Zeynep Hazar
    Karabicak, Gul Oznur
    Sozlu, Ugur
    Pala, Omer Osman
    Alkan, Zeynep Beyza
    Basar, Selda
    Citaker, Seyit
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (03) : 295 - 298
  • [5] Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Yao, Min
    Li, Zhen-jun
    Zhu, Sen
    Wang, Jun-yan
    Pan, Yan-fang
    Tian, Zi-rui
    Shen, Li-yang
    Cheng, Shao-dan
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) : E357 - E364
  • [6] Reliability and validity of an adapted Saudi Arabic version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-30) in Saudi Arabia
    Abdulmajeed Alzakri
    Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 281 - 287
  • [7] Reliability and validity of an adapted Saudi Arabic version of scoliosis research society outcomes questionnaire (SRS-30) in Saudi Arabia
    Alzakri, Abdulmajeed
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (02) : 281 - 287
  • [8] The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A Turkish validation study
    Aksekili, Mehmet Atif Erol
    Aktekin, Lale
    Korkmazer, Selcuk
    Akyol, Mesut
    Kilicarslan, Kasim
    Tosun, Nihat
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (06) : 718 - 722
  • [9] Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Yao, Min
    Yang, Long
    Zhu, Bin
    Xu, Bao-ping
    Chen, Ni
    Wang, Xiao-tao
    Cheng, Shao-dan
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (20) : 1438 - 1445
  • [10] Testing the validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the pain DETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain
    Abu-Shaheen, Amani
    Yousef, Shehu
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Nofal, Abdullah
    AlFayyad, Isamme
    Khan, Sarfaraz
    Heena, Humariya
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):