Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire

被引:6
|
作者
Yao, Min [1 ]
Yang, Long [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Bin [3 ]
Xu, Bao-ping [1 ]
Chen, Ni [4 ]
Wang, Xiao-tao [1 ]
Cheng, Shao-dan [2 ]
Wang, Yong-jun [4 ]
Cui, Xue-jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Inst Spine Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Guanghua Hosp Integrated Tradit Chinese, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Liuzao Community Hlth Serv Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Longhua Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
agreement; cross-cultural translation; Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire; minimal important change; responsiveness; simplified Chinese version; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; GLOBAL BURDEN; TURKISH VERSION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; QUALITY; RESPONSIVENESS; PREVALENCE; DIFFERENCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000002692
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Psychometric test of the cross-cultural adaptation the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) in low back pain (LBP) patients. Objective. To investigate the agreement, responsiveness, and minimal important change (MIC) of the simplified Chinese version of the JOABPEQ in LBP patients. Summary of Background Data. The factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, floor and ceiling effect of simplified Chinese JOABPEQ have been tested, while the agreement, responsiveness, and MIC were required. Methods. The agreement, responsiveness, and MIC of the simplified Chinese version were assessed by completing the Chinese JOABPEQ twice. Agreement was tested with Bland-Altman plot. Responsiveness was operationalized using receiver operating characteristic analyses. The anchor-based method was used to calculate MIC. Results. One hundred sixty-two of 184 patients returned to finish the booklet twice were available for analysis (response rate: 88.0%). While the responsiveness, the area under the curves of each subscale were ranged from 0.746 to 0.875, which meant a good responsiveness. While the MIC (MIC%) of simplified Chinese JOABPEQ was 19.28 (44.98%) for Q1 Low back pain, 15.20 (24.13%) for Q2 Lumbar function, 15.79 (22.76%) for Q3 Walking ability, 9.58 (19.86%) for Q4 Social life function, 7.33 (17.28%) for Q5 Mental health. While compared with the MIC, only the Q3 Walking ability had a positive rating for agreement in the Bland-Altman plot. Conclusion. The simplified Chinese JOABPEQ has positive agreement of Q3 Walk ability and acceptable to excellent responsiveness of all the subscales. The MICs for subscales of the simplified Chinese JOABPEQ ranged from 7.33 to 19.28 points.
引用
收藏
页码:1438 / 1445
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simplified Chinese Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Yao, Min
    Li, Zhen-jun
    Zhu, Sen
    Wang, Jun-yan
    Pan, Yan-fang
    Tian, Zi-rui
    Shen, Li-yang
    Cheng, Shao-dan
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) : E357 - E364
  • [2] Psychometric validation of the adapted Traditional Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)
    Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang
    Wong, Carlos King Ho
    Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (05) : 750 - 757
  • [3] Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
    Nakamura, Masao
    Miyamoto, Kei
    Shimizu, Katsuji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2009, 14 (04) : 367 - 373
  • [4] Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
    Gunaydin, Gurkan
    Kanik, Zeynep Hazar
    Karabicak, Gul Oznur
    Sozlu, Ugur
    Pala, Omer Osman
    Alkan, Zeynep Beyza
    Basar, Selda
    Citaker, Seyit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (03) : 295 - 298
  • [5] The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version
    Poosiripinyo, Thanate
    Paholpak, Permsak
    Jirarattanaphochai, Kitti
    Kosuwon, Weerachai
    Sirichativapee, Winai
    Wisanuyotin, Taweechok
    Laupattarakasem, Pat
    Sukhonthamarn, Kamolsak
    Jeeravipoolvarn, Polasak
    Sakakibara, Toshihiko
    Kasai, Yuichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (01) : 34 - 37
  • [6] Establishment of reference scores and interquartile ranges for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) in patients with low back pain
    Tominaga, Ryoji
    Sekiguchi, Miho
    Yonemoto, Koji
    Kakuma, Tatsuyuki
    Konno, Shin-ichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (04) : 643 - 648
  • [7] Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability
    Fukui, Mitsuru
    Chiba, Kazuhiro
    Kawakami, Mamoru
    Kikuchi, Shinichi
    Konno, Shinichi
    Miyamoto, Masabumi
    Seichi, Atsushi
    Shimamura, Tadashi
    Shirado, Osamu
    Taguchi, Toshihiko
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Tani, Toshikazu
    Toyama, Yoshiaki
    Yonenobu, Kazuo
    Wada, Eiji
    Tanaka, Takashi
    Hirota, Yoshio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2007, 12 (06) : 526 - 532
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation of The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire: A methodological systematic review
    Zhou, Ai-fang
    Li, Zhuo-yao
    Cui, Xue-jun
    Sng, Kim Sia
    Zhu, Ke
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Shu, Bing
    Zhang, Jian-ping
    Yao, Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (05) : 984 - 991
  • [9] Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers
    Hashizume, Hiroshi
    Konno, Shin-ichi
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Fukui, Mitsuru
    Takahashi, Kazuhisa
    Chiba, Kazuhiro
    Miyamoto, Masabumi
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Kasai, Yuichi
    Kanamori, Masahiko
    Matsunaga, Shunji
    Hosono, Noboru
    Kanchiku, Tsukasa
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    Tanaka, Nobuhiro
    Kanayama, Masahiro
    Shimizu, Takachika
    Kawakami, Mamoru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (02) : 264 - 280
  • [10] Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Yao, Min
    Li, Zhen-jun
    Zhu, Bin
    Xu, Bao-ping
    Zhu, Sen
    Pan, Yan-fang
    Wang, Xiao-tao
    Tian, Zi-rui
    Deng, Zhen
    Ye, Jie
    Wang, Yong-jun
    Cui, Xue-jun
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (08) : 1516 - 1523