How economic freedom reflects on the Bitcoin transaction network

被引:6
|
作者
Ricci, Piergiorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
来源
关键词
Bitcoin; Blockchain; Cryptocurrencies; Social network analysis; Fintech; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; BUREAUCRACY; INFLATION;
D O I
10.1007/s40812-019-00143-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on the assumption that economic freedom facilitates the growth of traditional economic sectors, this study seeks to understand the role it plays in fintech sector. For this purpose, by adopting the social network analysis methodological approach, it considers the geographical network of Bitcoin transactions as a proxy to measure the national level of fintech development and compares it with a set of economic freedom indicators related to the top 70 world economies. The analysis revealed significant relationships between the performed network centrality measures and national levels of economic freedom. In particular, as confirmed by the implemented multilevel regression models, high levels of freedom to trade internationally combined with a restrained value of inflation and low administrative requirements can be considered as determining factors for fintech development. The study also showed a large number of Bitcoin transactions conducted in those countries characterized by fewer capital controls and restrictions, a result that feeds suspicions of illegal behavior, such as money laundering or terrorism financing, carried out through the use of cryptocurrencies. Findings of this research might be strategic for fintech entrepreneurship and policymakers interested in designing policies that aim to foster innovative sectors while ensuring the legality of financial flows.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 161
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bitcoin transaction fees and the decentralization of Bitcoin mining pools
    Li, Zhicheng
    Li, Jialong
    Zhou, Ke
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [22] Bitcoin Transaction Malleability and MtGox
    Decker, Christian
    Wattenhofer, Roger
    [J]. COMPUTER SECURITY - ESORICS 2014, PT II, 2014, 8713 : 313 - 326
  • [23] Bitcoin returns and transaction activity
    Koutmos, Dimitrios
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 167 : 81 - 85
  • [24] Preserving transaction privacy in bitcoin
    Wang, Qin
    Qin, Bo
    Hu, Jiankun
    Xiao, Fu
    [J]. FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE, 2020, 107 : 793 - 804
  • [25] An Analysis of Transaction Handling in Bitcoin
    Gebraselase, Befekadu G.
    Helvik, Bjarne E.
    Jiang, Yuming
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART DATA SERVICES (SMDS 2021), 2021, : 162 - 172
  • [26] Transaction Community Identification in Bitcoin
    Zhang, Yuhang
    Wang, Jun
    Zhao, Fei
    [J]. 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2020), 2020, : 140 - 144
  • [27] Strangely mined bitcoins: Empirical analysis of anomalies in the bitcoin blockchain transaction network
    Oskarsdottir, Maria
    Mallett, Jacky
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [28] Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network With Hybrid Motifs
    Wu, Jiajing
    Liu, Jieli
    Chen, Weili
    Huang, Huawei
    Zheng, Zibin
    Zhang, Yan
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2022, 52 (04): : 2237 - 2249
  • [29] Bitcoin Market Return and Volatility Forecasting Using Transaction Network Flow Properties
    Yang, Steve Y.
    Kim, Jinhyoung
    [J]. 2015 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI), 2015, : 1778 - 1785
  • [30] Determination of equilibrium transaction fees in the Bitcoin network: A rank-order contest
    Kim, Daehan
    Ryu, Doojin
    Webb, Robert I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 86