Study design considerations in clinical trials with marihuana

被引:0
|
作者
Jones, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Political and social pressures exist to make smoked marihuana available for treatment of a variety of seemingly unrelated medical disorders. Efficacy of smoked marihuana for any disorder remains unproven by scientifically valid techniques. Study design considerations for clinical trials with marihuana are considered. Marihuana is a plant with great variability. Although the clinical pharmacology of THC is well studied, relatively little medication development efforts have been devoted to marihuana itself. Control of delivered cannabinoid dose from smoked marihuana will be difficult. Protocols that require multiple dose levels and placebos will present problems. The availability of illicit marihuana may pose compliance problems in controlled trials, particularly with patients assigned to low-dose or placebo conditions. Some patients may consider the diversity of marihuana effects, particularly cognitive and cardiovascular effects, as adverse or unwanted. Decisions about the ultimate usefulness of marihuana should be based on relative benefits and risks. The risks of smoked marihuana for some medical applications may be greater than the risks posed by typical nonmedical use because of more frequent and regular dosing. Marihuana's utility as a medicine should be determined by generally accepted principles guiding medication development. Standards for determining the efficacy and safety of marihuana as a therapeutic agent should be equivalent to those used in other medication trials. Problematic study design issues are a consequence of the need to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a smoked, crude natural product. Clinical trials with marihuana will be difficult, and fairly expensive to execute, but not impossible.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 151
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and analysis considerations for first treatment escalation in clinical trials
    Wei, Wei
    Dougados, Maxime
    Bernasconi, Corrado
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 104
  • [32] Composite outcomes for pain clinical trials: considerations for design and interpretation
    Gewandter, Jennifer S.
    McDermott, Michael P.
    Evans, Scott
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Markman, John D.
    Simon, Lee S.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    [J]. PAIN, 2021, 162 (07) : 1899 - 1905
  • [33] Clinical trials of antitumor agents: Experimental design and timeline considerations
    Frei, E
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 1997, 3 (03): : 127 - 136
  • [34] Considerations in the design of clinical trials of neuroprotective therapy in acute stroke
    Dorman, PJ
    Sandercock, PAG
    [J]. STROKE, 1996, 27 (09) : 1507 - 1515
  • [35] STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ON DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF BRIDGING AND MULTIREGIONAL CLINICAL TRIALS
    Tsong, Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2012, 22 (05) : 1078 - 1080
  • [36] Multipopulation Tailoring Clinical Trials: Design, Analysis, and Inference Considerations
    Millen, Brian A.
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
    Zhang, Zongjun
    Williams, Dominique
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2014, 48 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [37] Ethical Considerations in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials of Artificial Intelligence
    Youssef, Alaa
    Nichol, Ariadne A.
    Martinez-Martin, Nicole
    Larson, David B.
    Abramoff, Michael
    Wolf, Risa M.
    Char, Danton
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (09)
  • [38] Statistical design considerations for trials that study multiple indications
    Kaizer, Alexander M.
    Koopmeiners, Joseph S.
    Chen, Nan
    Hobbs, Brian P.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (03) : 785 - 798
  • [39] Considerations for crossover design in clinical study
    Lim, Chi-Yeon
    In, Junyong
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 74 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [40] Considerations concerning the use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials - a qualitative study
    Flight, Laura
    Hind, Daniel
    Julious, Steven
    Brennan, Alan
    Todd, Susan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20