Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale

被引:66
|
作者
Landuyt, Dries [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Broekx, Steven [1 ]
Goethals, Peter L. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Flemish Inst Technol Res VITO, Unit Environm Modelling, Boeretang 200, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Lab Environm Toxicol & Aquat Ecol, Jozef Plateaustr 22, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Forest & Nat Lab, Geraardsbergsesteenweg 267, B-9090 Melle Gontrode, Belgium
关键词
Joint probability distribution; Interaction; Correlation; Synergy; BBN; BIODIVERSITY; SYNERGIES; SUPPORT; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; BUNDLES; CONSERVATION; PROVISION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.015
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Knowledge on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services is crucial for the design of land use strategies that optimize ecosystem service delivery. Correlation coefficients, obtained through pairwise comparison of ecosystem service provision maps, have been put forward as suitable indicators to quantify these interactions. However, for more in depth analyses of trade-offs and synergies where driving forces of interactions need to be determined, more sophisticated methods are needed. Although Bayesian belief networks have been frequently mentioned as promising tools to investigate interactions among ecosystem services, up till now, no structured approaches to do so have been suggested. This paper presents a way to analyse trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services together with their driving forces. Joint probability distributions of ecosystem service pairs, which can be calculated by using Bayesian belief network models, are used to quantify interactions. The paper demonstrates the approach by quantifying trade-offs and synergies among several ecosystem services in Flanders, Belgium. Our analysis identifies two bundles of ecosystem services which react synergistically. Wood production and several regulating services on the one hand and food production and soil formation on the other hand. Trade-offs are identified among food production and most of the other services that were included into the analysis. In addition to these general findings, the analysis shows that the identified interactions may change depending on the considered environmental conditions, specified through soil type, land cover and land use. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 335
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015
    W. Chen
    G. Chi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3221 - 3236
  • [32] Climate change, dermatology and ecosystem services; trends and trade-offs
    Muller, Scott A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 50 (05) : 504 - 507
  • [33] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [34] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [35] Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China
    Li, Boyan
    Wang, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 837 - 846
  • [36] Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in Costa Rica
    Locatelli, Bruno
    Imbach, Pablo
    Wunder, Sven
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 41 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [37] Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns
    Jopke, Cornelius
    Kreyling, Juergen
    Maes, Joachim
    Koellner, Thomas
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 49 : 46 - 52
  • [38] Biodiversity mitigates trade-offs among species functional traits underpinning multiple ecosystem services
    Walden, Emelie
    Queiroz, Cibele
    Plue, Jan
    Lindborg, Regina
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 26 (06) : 929 - 941
  • [39] Accounting for spatial autocorrelation is needed to avoid misidentifying trade-offs and bundles among ecosystem services
    Shaikh, Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad
    See, Sin Ching
    Richards, Daniel
    Belcher, Richard N.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Torres, Marcelo Galleguillos
    Carrasco, L. Roman
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 129
  • [40] Unravelling the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies among hydrological ecosystem services in a large floodplain lake
    Li, Bing
    Yang, Guishan
    Wan, Rongrong
    Hamilton, David P.
    Wang, Xueran
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 172