共 40 条
Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge (BOOK): A Questionnaire to Assess Overdose Knowledge in Individuals Who Use Illicit or Prescribed Opioids
被引:42
|作者:
Dunn, Kelly E.
[1
]
Barrett, Frederick S.
[1
]
Yepez-Laubach, Claudia
[1
]
Meyer, Andrew C.
[3
]
Hruska, Bryce J.
[3
]
Sigmon, Stacey C.
[3
,4
]
Fingerhood, Michael
[2
]
Bigelow, George E.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Behav Pharmacol Res Unit, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
chronic pain;
naloxone;
opioid use disorder;
opioids;
overdose;
NALOXONE DISTRIBUTION PROGRAMS;
AMAZONS MECHANICAL TURK;
UNITED-STATES;
PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS;
HEROIN OVERDOSE;
AGING QUIZ;
DEATHS;
ABUSE;
DRUG;
INCREASES;
D O I:
10.1097/ADM.0000000000000235
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Opioid overdose is a public health crisis. This study describes efforts to develop and validate the Brief Opioid Overdose Knowledge (BOOK) questionnaire to assess patient knowledge gaps related to opioid overdose risks. Methods: Two samples of illicit opioid users and a third sample of patients receiving an opioid for the treatment of chronic pain (total N = 848) completed self-report items pertaining to opioid overdose risks. Results: A 3-factor scale was established, representing Opioid Knowledge (4 items), Opioid Overdose Knowledge (4 items), and Opioid Overdose Response Knowledge (4 items). The scale had strong internal and face validity. Patients with chronic pain performed worse than illicit drug users in almost all items assessed, highlighting the need to increase knowledge of opioid overdose risk to this population. Conclusions: This study sought to develop a brief, internally valid method for quickly assessing deficits in opioid overdose risk areas within users of illicit and prescribed opioids, to provide an efficient metric for assessing and comparing educational interventions, facilitate conversations between physicians and patients about overdose risks, and help formally identify knowledge deficits in other patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 323
页数:10
相关论文