Gender comparison of muscarinic receptor expression and function in rat and human urinary bladder:: differential regulation of M2 and M3 receptors?

被引:52
|
作者
Kories, C
Czyborra, C
Fetscher, C
Schneider, T
Krege, S
Michel, MC
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Med, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
关键词
bladder; gender; muscarinic receptor; phospholipase C; G-protein; contraction;
D O I
10.1007/s00210-003-0713-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Since symptoms of bladder dysfunction occur more frequently in women than in men and since muscarinic receptors are the physiologically most important system to mediate bladder contraction, we have compared the number, subtype distribution and function of muscarinic receptors in bladders from male and female rats. Muscarinic receptor function was also assessed in bladder strips from male and female human bladder. Male and female rats expressed a similar number of muscarinic receptors (144+/-5 vs. 140+/-6 fmol/mg protein in saturation radioligand binding). While competition binding curves for the moderately M-2-selective methoctramine were not consistently better fitted by a two-site model, most competition curves for the M-3-selective darifenacin were biphasic and yielded 29+/-10% and 31+/-7% high affinity sites (corresponding to M-3 receptors) in male and females, respectively. Immunoreactivity of alpha-subunits of the G-proteins G(q/11), G(i1/2), G(i3) and G(s) did not significantly differ between both genders. The muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol similarly stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation in bladder slices from male and female rats with calculated maximum responses of 69+/-17 and 77+/-18% over basal and pEC(50) values of 4.90+/-0.45 and 4.40+/-0.46, respectively. While darifenacin inhibited carbachol-stimulated inositol phosphate formation approximately 100-fold more potently than methoctramine, each antagonist was similarly potent in both genders. Carbachol concentration-dependently contracted bladder strips with a pEC(50) of 5.66+/-0.05 and 5.72+/-0.06 and maximum effects of 4.3+/-0.1 and 4.2+/-0.2 mN/mg wet weight in male and female rats, respectively. The con-tractile effect of carbachol was concentration-dependently antagonised by the non-selective atropine (1-30 nM), the M-1-selective pirenzepine (1-30 M), the M-2-selective methoctramine (1-10 muM) and the M-3-selective darifenacin (10-100 nM), with the latter exhibiting a partly unsurmountable antagonism. The overall potency of all four antagonists suggested that contraction was mediated predominantly if not exclusively by M-3 receptors with no appreciable differences between both male and female rats. Similarly, the maximum effects (4.4+/-0.6 vs. 4.4+/-2.4 mN/mg) and pEC(50) (6.07+/-0.05 vs. 6.32+/-0.14) of carbachol did not differ between genders in bladder samples from 25 consecutive patients. We conclude that number und function of muscarinic receptors and the relative roles of their M-2 and M-3 subtypes do not differ between urinary bladders of male and female rats; at least with regard to overall muscarinic responsiveness this situation appears to be similar in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 531
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Selective alkylation of rat urinary bladder muscarinic receptors with 4-DAMP mustard reveals a contractile function for the M2 muscarinic receptor
    Braverman, AS
    Ruggieri, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECEPTOR AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION RESEARCH, 1999, 19 (05): : 819 - 833
  • [32] Comparison of the pharmacological antagonism of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors expressed in isolation and in combination
    Griffin, MT
    Hsu, JCH
    Shehnaz, D
    Ehlert, FJ
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 65 (08) : 1227 - 1241
  • [33] Functional roles of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in neurogenic contractions in mouse bladder studied with receptor knockout mice
    Unno, Toshihiro
    Yamamoto, Masayuki
    Hayashi, Toshimi
    Koide, Kento
    Tanahashi, Yasuyuki
    Matsuyama, Hayato
    Yamada, Masahisa
    Jurgen, Wess
    Komori, Seiichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 112 : 193P - 193P
  • [34] Differential regulation of muscarinic M2 and M3 receptor signaling in gastrointestinal smooth muscle by caveolin-1
    Bhattacharya, Sayak
    Mahavadi, Sunila
    Al-Shboul, Othman
    Rajagopal, Senthilkumar
    Grider, John R.
    Murthy, Karnam S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 305 (03): : C334 - C347
  • [35] In vivo evidence for a functional role of muscarinic M2 receptors in rat urinary bladder
    Cefalu, JS
    Shetty, SG
    Silva, R
    Watson, N
    Eglen, RM
    [J]. LIFE SCIENCES, 2001, 68 (22-23) : 2630 - 2630
  • [36] Regulation of M3 Muscarinic Receptor Expression and Function by Transmembrane Protein 147
    Rosemond, Erica
    Rossi, Mario
    McMillin, Sara M.
    Scarselli, Marco
    Donaldson, Julie G.
    Wess, Juergen
    [J]. MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 79 (02) : 251 - 261
  • [37] J-104129, a novel muscarinic M3 receptor antagonist with high selectivity for M3 over M2 receptors
    Mitsuya, M
    Mase, T
    Tsuchiya, Y
    Kawakami, K
    Hattori, H
    Kobayashi, K
    Ogino, Y
    Fujikawa, T
    Satoh, A
    Fujikawa, T
    Satoh, A
    Kimura, T
    Noguchi, K
    Ohtake, N
    Tomimoto, K
    [J]. BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 7 (11) : 2555 - 2567
  • [38] Mechanisms of M2 or M3 muscarinic receptor-mediated contractions in bladder smooth muscle
    Yamamoto, Masayuki
    Hayashi, Toshimi
    Matsuyama, Hayato
    Yamada, Masahisa
    Wess, Jurgen
    Unno, Toshihiro
    Komori, Seiichi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 109 : 175P - 175P
  • [39] Cystometric findings in mice lacking muscarinic M2 or M3 receptors
    Igawa, Y
    Zhang, XY
    Nishizawa, O
    Umeda, M
    Iwata, A
    Taketo, MM
    Manabe, T
    Matsui, M
    Andersson, KE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06): : 2460 - 2464
  • [40] Contribution of M2 and M3 Muscarinic Receptors in Small Airway Contraction
    Brown, S. M.
    Sturton, R. G.
    Koarai, A.
    Barnes, P. J.
    Donnelly, L. E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 179