Use of vocalizations to estimate population size of roe deer

被引:11
|
作者
Reby, D [1 ]
Hewison, AJM [1 ]
Cargnelutti, B [1 ]
Angibault, JM [1 ]
Vincent, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Inst Rech Grands Mammiferes, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1998年 / 62卷 / 04期
关键词
barking frequency; Capreolus capreolus; capture-mark-recapture; density estimators; population estimation; radiotracking; vocalization;
D O I
10.2307/3802000
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Estimating population abundance of large mammals generally requires substantial time and effort, and low-investment alternatives are needed. We present a novel application of a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) method, using vocalization frequency to estimate the size of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations. The technique involves walking along fixed transects to disturb all animals present on a study plot, potentially provoking a vocal response. Those animals heard to vocalize (whether observed or not) are then considered the total number of "marked" individuals in the population. The proportion of "marked" individuals in the population is estimated from the proportion of animals that vocalize in the subsample of individuals observed (the vocalization frequency). Population size is estimated by dividing the number of marked individuals by the vocalization frequency, correcting for bias, which is directly analogous to the Lincoln-Petersen (L-P) estimate for CMR. We used this method to estimate population size for roe deer inhabiting a 150-ha forest plot for 8 separate surveys, and we used the LP estimator to compare our estimates to mark-resight estimates. We estimated deer density as 23.45 +/- 7.80 deer/100 ha by CMR and 19.87 +/- 7.92 deer/100 ha by the vocalization frequency (VF) method ((x) over bar +/- SE). If the assumptions are met, this method provides estimates of absolute population size at low cost and with little material investment, because physical capture and marking of animals is not necessary. Further research is required to validate the assumption that visually observed animals have the same probability of vocalizing as those disturbed but not seen.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mitochondrial DNA distinction of northeastern China roe deer, Siberian roe deer, and European roe deer, to clarify the taxonomic status of northeastern China roe deer
    Xiao, Chao-Ting
    Zhang, Ming-Hai
    Fu, Yan
    Koh, Hung-Son
    BIOCHEMICAL GENETICS, 2007, 45 (1-2) : 93 - 102
  • [32] Mitochondrial DNA Distinction of Northeastern China Roe Deer, Siberian Roe Deer, and European Roe Deer, to Clarify the Taxonomic Status of Northeastern China Roe Deer
    Chao-Ting Xiao
    Ming-Hai Zhang
    Yan Fu
    Hung-Son Koh
    Biochemical Genetics, 2007, 45 : 93 - 102
  • [33] Woodland features determining home range size of roe deer
    Lovari, Sandro
    Serrao, Giulia
    Mori, Emiliano
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2017, 140 : 115 - 120
  • [34] FIELD ROE DEER IN WINTER - IS THERE AN OPTIMAL GROUP-SIZE
    SIEBER, J
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR JAGDWISSENSCHAFT, 1995, 41 (01): : 8 - 12
  • [35] USE OF GAME BIOLOGY RESEARCH RESULTS IN MANAGEMENT OF RED DEER AND ROE DEER
    HOFMANN, RR
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR JAGDWISSENSCHAFT, 1980, 26 (03): : 171 - 172
  • [36] FOOD AVAILABILITY AS A FACTOR IN HABITAT USE BY ROE DEER
    CIBIEN, C
    SEMPERE, A
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1989, 34 (1-11): : 111 - 123
  • [37] Assessing microhabitat use by roe deer and moose in China
    Jiang, Guangshun
    Ma, Jianzhang
    Zhang, Minghai
    Stott, Philip
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (02) : 134 - 142
  • [38] The effects of hurricane Lothar on habitat use of roe deer
    Widmer, O
    Saïd, S
    Miroir, J
    Duncan, P
    Gaillard, JM
    Klein, F
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 195 (1-2) : 237 - 242
  • [39] RELIABILITY OF PETERSEN METHOD TESTED ON A ROE-DEER POPULATION
    STRANDGAARD, H
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1967, 31 (04): : 643 - +
  • [40] ISOZYME VARIATION IN ROE DEER IN RELATION TO THEIR POPULATION HISTORY IN BRITAIN
    HEWISON, AJM
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1995, 235 : 279 - 288