Use of vocalizations to estimate population size of roe deer

被引:11
|
作者
Reby, D [1 ]
Hewison, AJM [1 ]
Cargnelutti, B [1 ]
Angibault, JM [1 ]
Vincent, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Inst Rech Grands Mammiferes, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1998年 / 62卷 / 04期
关键词
barking frequency; Capreolus capreolus; capture-mark-recapture; density estimators; population estimation; radiotracking; vocalization;
D O I
10.2307/3802000
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Estimating population abundance of large mammals generally requires substantial time and effort, and low-investment alternatives are needed. We present a novel application of a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) method, using vocalization frequency to estimate the size of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations. The technique involves walking along fixed transects to disturb all animals present on a study plot, potentially provoking a vocal response. Those animals heard to vocalize (whether observed or not) are then considered the total number of "marked" individuals in the population. The proportion of "marked" individuals in the population is estimated from the proportion of animals that vocalize in the subsample of individuals observed (the vocalization frequency). Population size is estimated by dividing the number of marked individuals by the vocalization frequency, correcting for bias, which is directly analogous to the Lincoln-Petersen (L-P) estimate for CMR. We used this method to estimate population size for roe deer inhabiting a 150-ha forest plot for 8 separate surveys, and we used the LP estimator to compare our estimates to mark-resight estimates. We estimated deer density as 23.45 +/- 7.80 deer/100 ha by CMR and 19.87 +/- 7.92 deer/100 ha by the vocalization frequency (VF) method ((x) over bar +/- SE). If the assumptions are met, this method provides estimates of absolute population size at low cost and with little material investment, because physical capture and marking of animals is not necessary. Further research is required to validate the assumption that visually observed animals have the same probability of vocalizing as those disturbed but not seen.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SUMMER FOOD AS FACTOR LIMITING ROE DEER POPULATION-SIZE
    BOBEK, B
    NATURE, 1977, 268 (5615) : 47 - 49
  • [2] ESTIMATION OF THE ROE DEER POPULATION IN WOODLAND
    VINCENT, JP
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR JAGDWISSENSCHAFT, 1982, 28 (01): : 58 - 63
  • [3] Integrated modeling to estimate population size and composition of mule deer
    Furnas, Brett J.
    Landers, Russ H.
    Hill, Scott
    Itoga, Stuart S.
    Sacks, Benjamin N.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 82 (07): : 1429 - 1441
  • [4] Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): an index of individual and population conditions
    Pelabon, C
    van Breukelen, L
    OECOLOGIA, 1998, 116 (1-2) : 1 - 8
  • [5] Roe deer on ice: Selection despite limited effective population size through the Pleistocene
    Alexander, Alana
    Dutoit, Ludovic
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2020, 29 (15) : 2765 - 2767
  • [6] Asymmetry in antler size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus ): an index of individual and population conditions
    Christophe Pélabon
    Leo van Breukelen
    Oecologia, 1998, 116 : 1 - 8
  • [7] Dynamic modelling of a roe deer population in a GIS
    Radeloff, V
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR JAGDWISSENSCHAFT, 1996, 42 (03): : 203 - 213
  • [8] Using spotlight counts to estimate mule deer population size and trends
    Kie, JG
    Boroski, BB
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME, 1995, 81 (02): : 55 - 70
  • [9] DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF A FIELD ROE DEER POPULATION
    KALUZINSKI, J
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1982, 27 (25-3): : 385 - 408
  • [10] THE SEASONAL MIGRATIONS OF A SIBERIAN ROE DEER POPULATION
    DANILKIN, AA
    DARMAN, YA
    MINAYEV, AN
    REVUE D ECOLOGIE-LA TERRE ET LA VIE, 1992, 47 (03): : 231 - 243